Overcoming Our Wireless Racism: Sennheiser PX210BT

Being a Blackberry user (I use a Curve 9700), pairing the PX210BT is quite straight forward. It’s a one time pairing operation, and after that the phone will recognize the PX210BT everytime I turn it on. When I tried the PX210BT on my friend’s Iphone, I believe the pairing is even easier, as I didn’t need to enter any passkeys as I do on the Blackberry. The PX210BT will work on the Ipod Touch 3rd Gen (albeit with no track controls), and it will work fully on the 4th Gen Touch. For people using conventional Ipods, Sennheiser sells a dongle that connects to the Ipod conventional dock and sends out the bluetooth signal from there. They also make the dongle available for regular 3.5mm jacks. The PX210BT actually supports the newer apt-X Bluetooth standard, but not having the appropriate gadget, I’m not able to test out the apt-X connectivity. As it is, I don’t really hear any noticeable problems with the Bluetooth Connection, my main problem more to the source quality of the Blackberry. And it’s probably because I’ve been spoiled too much with the Hifiman HM-602, as regular Ipods now sound so flawed to my ears.

When Peter stopped by with his new Iphone 4G, it worked much better as a source than my Blackberry did. Gone is the constrained sound that I hear out of the Blackberry, and the sound was more open out of the Iphone. Not to mention the better Ipod-based UI over the Blackberry, and the more straightforward pairing with the Iphone 4G. Strangely, controlling Forward/Reverse through the PX210BT doesn’t work with the Iphone, the way it did with the Blackberry. But still it was not a big deal to me, since it’s easier to do all your controlling from the Iphone’s UI, including volume control.

The build quality of the PX210BT is really great, better than some other wired models. It’s quite tough, and I’ve seen Tino at Sennheiser twist the headband so hard without breaking it. It’s much sturdier than the typical PX100/200, or even the HD23X models. The fit and ergonomics is also among the best. It’s quite better than the newly released Beyerdynamic T50p in terms of fitting (the two models share a similar diameter pads & housing). The pads rest comfortably on the ears, with good pressure but not as tiring as the HD25-1. I even got a good amount of outside noise isolation from the PX210BT, something that I didn’t really expect.

The PX210BT comes with an audio cable that you can use for listening in a wired mode. A nice accessory just in case your Bluetooth phone ran out of battery and needs to connect to a regular player. It also charges right out of USB. I really can’t think of anything that the PX210BT misses in terms of design.

The other day I showed the PX210BT to a few audiophile friends who were hanging out at a headphone shop. This was a tough crowd to please, and yet they were all hugely surprised of how good the PX210BT sounds. Personally, the PX210BT definitely earns my audiophile certificate. It has one of the best frequency balance among all the portable closed headphones I’ve tried, which results in one of the most fun sounding Sennheiser headphone I’ve tried.

Once you’ve tried a wireless, it’s hard to go back to a wired model. It’s like having to use a corded phone after being used with cellphones. Likewise with the RS180 and the PX210BT (sadly, both aren’t mine and I have to return it). When I had the RS180 around, I only listened to the wired models because of the Zana Deux amp. And now, if someone asked me an opinion for the ultimate portable set up, it’s probably going to be the HM-602 with the PX210BT (with the bluetooth dongle obviously).

Gears used for review:
Headphone: Sennheiser PX210BT
Source: Iphone 4G, Blackberry Curve 9700 Smartphone

Rate this review

  • It's time to go Wireless, guys! Woohooo!

  • tisb0b

    Just out interest will you be reviewing the Meier Corda stagedac and concerto as I am rather curious on your thoughts.

    • No plans for the stagedac, but a friend just bought a Concerto which he plans to bring over for a match. I should be able to write something about it soon.

    • Heard the concerto today.. we had a few amps laying around for a comparison. It was a good amp, though quite lean on the mids and bass. Even compared to the 2-ch Beta22, which is not a thick mid & bass amp, the Concerto noticeably has a leaner sound signature. I opened up the casing and saw 6 AD797 opamps. No wonder, the sound signature is very typical of AD797 — very good treble but not so much mid and bass body. Compared to the M-Stage, for instance, the M-Stage has significantly more mid and low end, though not excessively. The Concerto's resolution and refinement is far ahead of the M-Stage though, and more closer to the Beta22. Another thing that I felt the Concerto to lack is voltage swing, as on high gain setting, we were up to 2-3 O'clock on the volume control, while on the M-Stage and the Beta22 we were on 9-10 O'clock.

  • iyayy

    you.. sennheiser fanboy you..

    lol. jk. ๐Ÿ˜€

    • If Sennheiser read that, they may consider becoming a main sponsor of my site. Dear Mr. Sennheiser, I can always change the logo to a HD800… ๐Ÿ˜›

      • Jose

        you already have on tweeter ๐Ÿ˜‰

        • I know… they don’t seem to respond though ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • cansman

    Hi Mike,

    I have the PXC310BT (noise cancelling version) and I agree with you that Sennheiser has produced a great series of high quality bluetooth enabled range of cans that are not getting enough attention they deserve!

    And I am listening to them right now through my CEntrance DACport – sweet!

    However, another headphone racism to REALLY overcome is the Bose around-ear (AE) headphones! They, in my opinion, sound even better than the PXC310BTs! The AEs have angled drivers, sound spacious and have very little driver resonance for a closed set of cans.

    Just treat the AEs like any other good set of cans – at least 200 hours run-in; and the sound really opens up, with great smoothness!

    You might want to try them at some stage. I think you will be suitably impressed!


    • Hey Cansman, thanks for writing.. yes I do think that there is a lot of discrimination happening in the world of headphones. I'll be on the lookout for the Bose AE headphones, I'm sure the local Bose shop has them.

  • Earfonia

    Good to know wireless technology is advancing to satisfy audiophile demand!
    Thanks Mike!

  • cansman

    Hi Mike,

    Just when we were talking about the Bose AE headphones – guess what has just been launched – the AE2 headphones! Here's the link:


    It looks physically larger than the original AEs – this is good because I found the originals a bit too fitting. Changes from what I can tell include memory foam earpads and angled ear-pieces. In terms of physical design, the AE2s address all the design quirks I found in the original. It should now fit very comfortably like the QC15s (which I also own – did I tell you that they sound good too ๐Ÿ™‚ – they incorporate what many headphones don't have – active equalisation! In my opinion, this is the way to go for the future of headphones, in addition to your point elsewhere about them being wireless. Perhaps the good sound you experienced using the RS 180s and the PX 210BTs might be due to some form of signal conditioning and not just them being self-powered, i.e., active equalisation – I don't know, I haven't verified this!).

    Anyways, back to the more conventional AE2. I am looking forward to hearing them myself. I hope they have slightly more bass extension and smoothness at the top end. The website actually says improvements in sound include "smoother audio throughout the entire frequency range, from full lows to clear highs".

    Thanks again for the always enjoyable read at your website!

    Cheers mate!


    • Hi Cansman, thanks for the notice. I’ll be on the lookout for the AE2 on the local Bose shops. Hopefully they’ll let me demo it. ๐Ÿ™‚

      What other headphones have you compared the AE to?

  • cansman

    Hi Mike,

    I have compared the AE to my HD650 and PXC310BT.



    • Very interesting. Any impressions of the AE to the HD650 and PXC310BT?

      • cansman

        Hi Mike,

        Sorry for the delay in my response :). I find the AE sound balance rather similar to the HD650 minus the deeper low end that the 650s are able to produce. The AEs are surprisingly transparent although it is certainly less refined than the 650s. However transient response is very good, almost matching the 650s in my opinion. It also has good PRaT like the 650s (only if the 650s are amped properly!). However decay is slightly too quick but it doesn’t detract from the music. The HD650s are of course world class cans! But the AEs are of sufficient high fidelity to enjoy them even after listening to the 650s!

        The 310BTs have a surprisingly good soundstage for such small earcups and are better than the AEs in my opinion. However, because the AEs have angled drivers, they sound less “in your head”. To me, the 310BTs have more midrange resonance than the AEs. I think the AEs are less coloured and more neutral. The 310BTs have a rather good bass punch and presence. The AEs in contrast is slightly light in the bass. However, the AEs have better overall coherence and PRaT – which makes them more enjoyable long term.

        From the description of the new AE2s, it looks like Bose has worked on the shortcomings of the original AEs. I look forward to hearing them when I get the chance.

        Hope my comparisons between the cans are clear enough.


        • That is a superb impression. I get a fairly good idea of how the AEs would sound. The AE would probably have a little more midbass than the HD650, I guess?

          • cansman

            Thanks Mike! Yeah, the AE has a little more midbass presentation than the 650s. Of course, the 650s dig much deeper in the low frequencies. In contrast, there’s not much low bass in the AE.

  • b3dz

    Yo Mike,Do you hve experience abt Ultrasone ED8?

    If yes, Which is better between Jh 16 & ED8 ( hve wider sound stage & decent bass)?

    • Sound signature is different, and so you can't really say which is "better" The ED8 has a typical Ultrasone house sound, though with fuller mids than most of the others, the JH16 has a typical Jerry Harvey house sound. One is an IEM, the other a headphone. Here is my Edition 8 review: http://www.headfonia.com/ultrasone-edition-8/

  • b3dz

    I was messed up.:) Actually, I'm abt comparing The ED8 with HD800.

    Hve any idea?

    • No problem, b3dz. Still with the HD800, more or less the same argument applies. The Ed8 can't really compete with the HD800 in terms of technicalities, but the two headphones have very different uses as well. The HD800 is more demanding of the set up, and is more suited for a home set up. The Edition 8 can be used portably and is a closed design.

      • b3dz

        Interesting. That was really helpful.

        Thx for ur info tho.

    • Chai Ilaik


      Can you please compare these Sennheiser with the Grado RS60i and the AKG K450. Im still not sure wich of these 3 I should buy.

      Thank you so much!!

      • Chai, don't know about the K450, but the PX210BT is one of the most balanced, funnest portable headphone I've ever encountered. Not to mention its wireless capability.

        I'd take the PX210BT over the Grado SR60i anytime of the day. Of course, you really need to know your preference, your music, and not take my statement as an absolute.

  • Bank

    great review mike ๐Ÿ˜‰ Now I'm planning to buy a new pair of portable headphones, but still hesitate between beyer t50p and px210bt. I've tried t50p and love its performance with female vocal and treble,but the model I tried wasn't burn-in yet. So, here is the question: will the SQ improve significantly after burn-in? and do you have any suggestion on which portable should I go for if I listen mostly to bossa nova, vocal jazz, and pop. Thank you in advance: D

    • Hi Bank, the T50p is more refined than the PX210BT, but the tonal balance is a bit weak and not as good as the PX210BT. Ultimately I wasn't able to enjoy the T50p despite its refinement, and so does many other people. The PX210BT, on the other hand is very well balanced and may be one of the best portable headphones around.

  • Denimhead

    Better my soon-to-be model, the ATH-es10 for a portable headphone? SHENANIGANS! They're expensive, though, I'll give you that. But for $300 USD shipped brand new, (I will not tell you how or where =]) I think the ATH-es10 is still the best.

    • That's cool, Denimhead. I'd love to be able to hear the ES10 again when I have the chance. ๐Ÿ™‚

  • Very nice read! I need a new pair of headphones and was considering the AKG 450 because my brother says only good things about them. But I think I’ll be going wireless with these Sennheiser’s now.

    Can these headphones pair to two devices? I’d love to be able to listen to them at my computer and with my 4th gen iPod touch. (If not, I guess I can use the wire with my computer)

    • Anonymous

      Hi Gordon,
      I think you have to un-pair it from your Touch before you can pair it to
      your computer.

      Please also read the other article about the bluetooth dongle.

    • Anonymous
      • I just read the manual online, and supposedly they can save up to 8 (!!) bluetooth device profiles. Not sure how it selects between two that are in the same area, but still, very impressive!

        I should be fine without the adapter; I have heard that the 4th gen iPod touch works with bluetooth controls. And my macbook pro has Apt-X BT :). Thanks again for the article.

        • Anonymous

          That’s awesome Gordon. Actually I was going to warn you about the
          Bluetooth adapter as volume level seem terribly limited when using that

  • blub

    Hi Mike,
    Hi Cansman,

    Thanks for the review and impressions on the PX 210 and PXC 310!!

    Could you give more info/your experience on the sound-isolation-properties of these headphones? (blocking outside noise & amount of leakage)
    This e.g. in comparison to the HD-25 or TMA-1, which are considered as very good passively isolating headphones.

    Could you also give your opinion on them with regard to sound-quality and presentation for listening to rock (both electric and acoustic), classical music, jazz, pop ?

    I’m looking for good travelling-headphones, for use also on public transport. So I’m considering the PXC 310 (BT), which should sound the same as the PX 210, but with active noise cancellation. But I’m doubting about their isolating capabilities (passive & active) and about their fitness for the music-genres I mentioned above.
    If the HD-25 or TMA-1 isolate as well for use on public transport, but purely passively, I might as well go with either one of those…or just stick with my Sony MDR 7506 which do fold but remains quite big… ๐Ÿ™‚

    • blub

      I forgot a third question ๐Ÿ™‚ :
      As these can also be used cabled, is the plug of the cable on the headphone-side a standard ‘jack’-plug?
      I ask this as I also read you’re thread on the after-market cables for theHD-25 and I wondered both if it would also help the PX-210/PXC-310/… and if it would need a ‘proprietary’ plug or a standard one.

      • blub

        does anyone has some insights or experience to share on these aspects (see post above) of the sennheiser px-210 (pxc-310) [ musical presentation // isolation // cable-options ] ?
        (Sorry for this kind of ‘bump’!)
        thanks in advance!!

  • Pingback: fsgb80v7cbwe()

  • Neonomide

    I actually lost my BT210s almost a year ago and decided to upgrade to the high-end model MM-450-X (Apt-x ready), since it’s comparatively pretty cheap where I live (Scandinavia) and had mics and sound cancellation (and singer Seal hyped them on Youtube :). I hped it would be the “ultimate solution” for a moving person like me. Interestingly, I found my BT210 a few weeks ago and now have had a wonderful opportunity to compare the two within my iPhone 4G.

    Overall, I think BT210 beats 450-model hands down on many criteria. It feels easier to find a proper ear position, it feels better on head and 210 is far better at bass, resolution and representing different (worse) quality recordings. Wire doesn’t seem to change things either. I feel 210 feels relaxing, fun and interesting overall in comparison, even though I still think HD-25 trumps it overall, but I should compare them more closely like I did with 450 and 210.

    Obviously, there are differing design features between the models too. MM-450 is less thick, more sleek and looks better with metal parts and one more LED button. Sound cancellation and mics are great features too and I mostly used 450 for podcasts anyway. The comeback to 210 is mesmerizing for me, I can’t imagine going back to 450 for my (re-born) musical needs and it makes me sad for 450.

    I must also admit that I haven’t used the usb-dongle yet in my comparison so that may change(?) something. I was thoroughly satisfied with dongle + 210 combination (I guess my favored volume level is less than others), but never used 450 with it. So I may update my thought soon.

    I really feel the cheapest model trumped the flagship this time around. The thing is, I like to use headset even when not listening since they warm my ears (it’s really cold here during winters) and wireless is simply the only way to go for me now. I just feel sad how these models seem so different with nice non-music use (450) and music use 210. Just wanted to express my thoughts.

    • Thanks for posting that! I actually still hasn’t got the chance to listen to the 450

  • rayner sierra

    wich ones sound better the PX210BT or the august EP650? does it worth spende the money difference?