SRH-840, HD25-1, and ESW-9

People has been asking me to do a comparison between the Shure SRH-840, the Sennheiser HD25-1, and the Audio Technica ESW-9. For a long time, the ESW-9 and the HD25-1 can be considered two of the most loved portable closed cans. Then, Shure released the SRH-840, and it also started to build a group of followers, me included. The SRH-840 actually is rather big to be called a portable, but somehow, perhaps due to its foldable design, gets discussed in the same category as the HD25-1 and the ESW-9. For me, the comparison is quite valid, as I also use the SRH-840 the same way I used the HD25-1: outdoors.

These three cans are very respected in the headphone community, and each has qualities that appeals to a big group of people. Each headphone, however, have a very distinct sound signature that makes them unique from each other. They are all very good at what they do, and for that reason, I don’t think it would be fair to rank one as better from the other.

The Audio Technica ESW-9 is very unique, in that it sounds like it has a tube amplifier permanently attached to its drivers. Though amplification and source can alter the sound of the ESW-9, at the end, the sound will still come out sounding smooth and tubey. This is one of the biggest reason that people get the ESW-9, to get a tube sound without actually using a tube amplifier. The ESW-9’s strong point is in the midrange, as its tube-like midrange sounds very pleasing, especially when listening to vocals. Another thing that the ESW-9 does well is covering up for mediocre and sibilant recordings.

While the ESW-9 has a strong point for sounding very tube-like, often the tube flavor can be very strong, and being a strongly colored headphone, the sound will not change much despite any changes you do on the amplifier and the source. This can be a double edged sword: it’s great when you really after that tube sound, as you won’t get it from the other headphones, but when you want a more “solid-state” sound, you’re not going to get it with the ESW-9. The ESW-9 is great for RnB and Modern Jazz. However, I wouldn’t recommend it for fast-paced music, as the ESW-9 can sound too relaxed.

SRH-840, HD25-1, and ESW-9
4 (80%) 1 vote

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

  • Reply January 28, 2013

    Eric Thompson

    SRH840’s don’t have enough bass for me, my DT 770’s and Denon D-5000’s sound like beats bass cannons compared to the SRH840’s but they have a detailed and flat mid-range and treble for monitoring, they would be really good for rock if they had a little more bass. I wouldn’t care so much if you could get more bass out of them but eq doesn’t do much either

  • Reply December 23, 2012

    lida zayiflama

    Check this out…

    The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available…

  • Reply December 23, 2012

    fsgb80v7cbwe

    Websites we think you should visit…

    we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out…

  • Reply October 23, 2011

    DodgersKings323

    Mike, just curious but where would the Beyerdynamic 7/800s fit into this big headphone mess?

    • Reply October 24, 2011

      Anonymous

      The DT770-880s you mean?

      Well technically the 770-880 are more capable than this trio, but in my opinion their voicing is best suited for monitoring and not music listening, though I know people who loves the 770-880 for music.

  • Reply May 5, 2011

    Globezero

    Hi Mike, Really like your reviews. I’m looking for a pair of on ear phones to supplement my IE8’s. I have tried ATH M50’s and find they are too big for my small head….. I listen to a wide variety of music from Female Vocal, Jazz, Electronic, Classical & Rock and would like something for all genres? Would the HD25-1 be a good choice or something open backed like a HD600 / 650? Suggestions greatly appreciated.

    • Reply May 5, 2011

      Anonymous

      Hi,
      If you think the M-50 are too big, then the HD600/650 would also be too
      big.

      The HD25-1 is a good one, but it’s a bit too forward and claustrophobic
      for classical. If you want to spend more money (~$500), the Sony Z1000
      (http://www.headfonia.com/first-impression-sony-z1000/) is a very good
      all rounder, though not as good as the HD25-1 for Rock. If you want to
      look into cheaper options, the ATH SJ55
      (http://www.headfonia.com/audio-technicas-entry-level-trio-sj11-sj33-and-sj55/)
      has quite a wide genre bandwith as well, should be good for most of the
      music you listed, except perhaps Classical.

      Obviously the Sony at $500 will give the best level of refinement, but
      if talking about purely genre bandwith, I think the SJ55 is just as good.

      • Reply January 21, 2012

        Chris Allen

        I thought the ESW-9 would be suitable for Classical music?

        • Reply January 21, 2012

          Mike

          It’s not bad, but not the best choice.

  • Reply December 16, 2010

    FLACvest

    BE the Pokemon Master… Collect All Three!!! HE HE HE!!!

Leave a Reply