Stax Omega2 Mk2 Review

Stax Omega2 Mk2 Review

August 7, 2010 |  by  |  $1000-$5000, Electrostatics, Featured, Full Size  | 

First of all I would like to thank Budi for making this review possible.

As the flagship STAX headphone, the Omega2 is the most perfect headphone I’ve ever listened to. All of us can start from different headphone preferences, and ultimately we would end up with the Omega2 as the ultimate end of all headphone. At this level, there is no more dynamic vs electrostatic debate. The Omega2 reigns supreme at the top of the food chain.

While the lesser Lambda frame Staxes are great, they do have some flaws that make them quite polarizing. Play some live recording on the Lambda frames and you’ll be impressed with the wide open sensation of the music. Play some closed mic-ed studio recording, and most of the time the Stax magic won’t work. I’ve reviewed the top Lambda model, the SR-404 Limited Edition along with the SR-404 Signature and the SR-Lambda Pro, and overall I don’t feel that they are genuinely better than top dynamic headphones like the HD800 or the Beyerdynamic T1.

However, with the Omega2, all the doubts I had with Electrostatics simply vanish. If only the Omega2 doesn’t come with such a high pricetag, and require multi-thousand dollar amplifiers. *sigh*


1 2 3 4Next Page»

Related Posts

  • Matt

    You made it sound like the omega 2 was the end of the road at the beginning of the article but by the end you made it sounds like you prefer the hd800? Was there any definitive winner in your book?

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Hi Matt, I'm glad you asked that question. Sometimes writing reviews, gosh, are not easy, and I may lead people to the wrong impression. I probably need to edit my conclusion there.

      I pointed out that the Omega2 has a limited extension (top and bottom) in comparison to the HD800. Detail is also less, and the thing with the soundstage coming from all around you but not the front. But I also said this:

      Despite the shortcomings on extension and detail level, the presentation of the music is far easier to like than the HD800. The frequency balance might not be too flat, yet it sounds very good on the ears, and I think that’s all that matters.

      I also want to quote the introduction part, where I said:

      As the flagship STAX headphone, the Omega2 is the most perfect headphone I’ve ever listened to. All of us can start from different headphone preferences, and ultimately we would end up with the Omega2 as the ultimate end of all headphone. At this level, there is no more dynamic vs electrostatic debate. The Omega2 reigns supreme at the top of the food chain.

      I think that's the highest praise I've given any headphone. Despite the technical shortcomings, what matters is how it plays the music. I can tell you that if I play a random playlist to ten people, 8 of 10 will probably choose the O2 over the HD800. It's just that good.

      The conclusion is not very positive, true, and that's probably what gives you the negative impression. Should've ended the article a different way. Again, thanks for the question. I do appreciate you asking that.

      • Matt

        Thanks for the detailed response Mike. I think the new ending does a great job of summing it up.

        • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

          Thanks Matt.

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      I added some stuff to the conclusion, to avoid further confusion. I also added some small stuff to the part about the Frequency Balance.

      • Jose

        Very nice review Mike. Thanks for doing such a great job every time!

        • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

          Thanks Jose. We strive because of support from people like you. :)

  • Ian

    Thanks for a great review. I've always wanted to try Stax gear but been frightened off by the cost which you mentioned in the concluding paragraphs. Just waiting to see comments over the next few months for a couple of new developments:

    * New headphone from Stax – SR5-7 – http://www.stax.co.jp/Export/SR507e.html

    * Woo Audio's Electrostatic Energiser – http://www.wooaudio.com/products/wee.html

  • manaox

    Nice review Mike, thanks for taking the time to write a detailed review and comparison.

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Hey dude, haven't seen you back here for a while. Been busy with other things?

  • Budi

    Mike, thought I may want to chip in a bit. Your article said that Mk2 solely available in black. This is not particularly correct. The black Mk2 is for export product whereas for domestic Japan, the Mk2 still comes in champagne color housing and brown cable. Just wanted to clarify

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Thanks for the info, I'll add it in!

  • Budi

    Mike, my apology, it actually comes in silver color for domestic market. Attached is the link http://www.stax.co.jp/Japan/sr-007a.html

    Export market remains the same ,black on black pads/cable. Once again my apology

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Thanks dude. I didn’t even check the website because I thought you’re the O2 expert. :P

  • Ahok

    Tried this yesterday, (soooo late lol)
    and im pretty much agree with mike, that this is a more preferable headphone to most people, because its signature is easier to preceive for many people, 
    and played most genre yesterday, from rock, to classical to j-pop, 
    all songs played by the omega2 flawlessly, 

    I also have the chance to audition the SR-009 (yeah), side by side with the SR-007Mk2, 
    driven from the SRM-007tII, 
    even though the technicalities on the SR-009 is slightly better, slightly here means the difference is really small, (a bit better soundstage and extension), 
    I prefer the darker sounding SR-007Mk2, as its very relaxing to hear, the brighter and less bodied SR-009 is not as relaxed as the 007Mk2

    • Anonymous

      Awesome review there man. ;)

      You know after the LCD-2 is released I think it would take a lot of people away from the O2. Tonally very similar (the version 1 at least), and though it’s not quite electrostatic-smooth like the O2, the bass is just phenomenal, and it doesn’t require a $2000 amplifier to drive. And at the end, bass remains the #1 problem I see with Stax headphones. Especially more that our music these days tend to be beats-heavy.

      • Ahok

        yeah, LCD-2Mk1 is very similar tonally wise to the O2Mk2, 

        the LCD-2 is a steal for its price, for its phenomenal bass, simplicity of its setup, and the level of sound it produces, 

        i think the LCD2 is more suited to nowadays beaty music than the O2, which has narrower genre bandwith, although i have no problem playing j-pop music on the O2Mk2, :D

  • Chevrol1

    This review is a joke.
    How many times did he wrote “black background”?
    What is a black background, is it absence of noise or what? If so, how many headphones noise by them themselves?
    “ you know that you’re still not using the best amplifier there is for the Omega2.” -about SRM-717.
    Ok, says who? Any independent test results that confirm this?
    Actually, Omega2 might be the best headphone in the world, I don’t know, but this kind of bullshit and nonsense isn’t useful for anyone.

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Yes I was just joking and this article is a total bullshit.

  • Pingback: fsgb80v7cbwe

  • Pingback: lida

  • Pingback: zayiflama ilaci