Chapter 2: FitEar Parterre
The next big product release that day is the new FitEar. Not as big of a spender like Shure, FitEar shared their booth in one medium-sized room along a few other manufacturers, including Custom IEM maker JHAudio, Unique Melody, 1964, and Canal Works. However just like on Shure’s booth, people are lining up to listen to the new FitEar. You don’t see a line like this other than on Shure’s and FitEars, so that has got to say something (although you can also say that the others have no new product release that day). Like Shure, FitEar was also just showcasing their latest thing though nothing is yet final as they are not selling it to the public. I asked some questions regarding driver configuration and pricing, but they didn’t say much. From some sources I gathered that the Partere is going to be priced around $800-$900 between the entry level 111 and the flagship universal 334ToGo
Sound wise, it was a more complete frequency balance than the mid-centric 111, but it didn’t have the super-spacious wow-effect that the 334 is famous for. The tuning is less of a mild v-shape that the 334ToGo is, definitely fuller than the 111, but it wasn’t as full sounding as the SE846 which I reckon will be its direct competitor. While the 334ToGo is an extremely impressive IEM by universal-fit standards, the Parterre was more of a “uh huh” impression for me. Even the Translucent Audio T1+2 which I thought is not quite 334ToGo level, I find to be better than the Parterre (Translucent also has a booth together with Aurisonics who showcased their new ASG-2).
Again, I think the tuning is mainstream-recording oriented, but overall not as well executed as the 846. For someone who wants a FitEar sound, I’d still recommend the 334 by quite a significant margin despite the price difference. I felt that the Partere’s midrange was a bit flat and dry to work with mainstream music and it was also less full and less refined than the 846. I hope they’ll revise the tuning further because I don’t think that this product is worthy of the FitEar name.
Next page: Ocharaku…
Dave Ulrich
That looked like fun! How did the cMoys sound?
John123John
give the continental a run for their money? haha
Dave Ulrich
I would guess not, but I would love to hear it regardless!
Mike
Well they were roughly Cmoy level in terms of technicalities. A little warmer and darker than the JDSLabs Cmoy but the mids were less clear.
Lam Tran
334 V-shape ??? is there anything wrong ??
Mike
What do you expect?
I used to be the sole distributor for FitEars and even now we have a lot of used FitEars being traded in on the Headfonia Store.
It’s extremely nice but it’s not the full mids tonality. The 335DW is the one to go for if you want a full mids.
Lam Tran
No, I mean this it weird , i’m both 334 and fitear parterre owner but I don’t find the 334 is V-Shape …. i even feel the 334 is a bit polite in treble region , I find the parterre have a lot of point better than 334 especially in separating instrument, same as 334 have it own advantages ( smoother and fuller mid )
Andru
I had listened to 081xxx batch and it’s definitely easy to noticed the v shape signature when compared to 082xxx batch.But i like the v shape 081xxx batch since it had more lively sound compared to 082xxx.
Mike
So now we have different sound from different batches? I’ve across so many 334s but never really find a difference, maybe I’m not listening well enough.
The other day they were saying that Translucent T1+2 all sounded different
Andru
The differents are on the cables,since both batch are sounded just same when swapped with ALO sxc cable.Not really a serious issues i think…
Mike
Alright thank you. That’s relieving to hear.
Mike
Wow I thought the Parterre is not yet out.
Lam Tran
yes, but I bought it through hp fes , there are 10 limited unit for sale on that day.
Mike
Phew, I suppose the 10 units were already out when I asked.
Mike
The 334ToGo to me has always sounded mildly v-shaped. I definitely won’t say it has a full mids.
Burju
That Tube Cmoy is a beaut….whoa
Mike
Indeed!
BigC
“This is going to be a hot IEM and I can imagine seeing a lot of used UE900s being dumped in the market.”
Interesting comment considering the new Shure IEM costs over twice the price of the UE900. Do you really think the demand will be that strong considering the massive price differential?
Mike
Okay maybe I’m not so good at speculation. Yes you have a good point regarding the price difference. The huge price difference. Gosh what a major thing to overlook.
Thing is the trend that I’m seeing is that people more and more won’t settle for anything than the best, and with customs all these time the biggest obstacle is that people don’t seem to want to go through the hassle of the process (at least for international customers) and possible needs for further re-fits. With the Shure they won’t have to deal with that hassle and they can still have this excellent sound.
Andru
Mike,how’s the build quality of SE846 plastic housings?
Mike
Just like the other Shure models, but they specifically mentioned that it was only a prototype and that the final product may be different.
l3A7VA7VA
Any other further Hifi-m8 impressions?
What headphones did you use for your testing at the show?( for the different products you demoed).
-Your own?
-Or the ones at the tables (I presume they had).
thank you.
Mike
Headphones I think I used their T1 Beyerdynamic. Sorry for the limited impression on the M8. Ended up chatting to Michael for a little too long.
Currawong (Amos)
Mike, it’s a shame I didn’t know you were coming to the show as it would have been good to meet you. Next time I hope.
Mike
I tried to get in touch with you but I can’t find your email! And Sean happened to be sick that week so I didn’t meet him either.
Maybe in fall…
John Seaber
Awesome Cmoys!
Mike
You gotta make some John!
SwimSonny
Just thinking with damping and the TERAs high OI it probably was not the best DAP to demo the 846 with and maybe that’s why the really deep subbass was not quite there. Over than that, awesome show report and males me wish I was there even more!
Mike
Yes, sorry probably not the best. It just happened to be my main DAP.
iamsocheap
sound (and technical level) wise, how would you compare the hm901 with your tera player?
Mike
I think the HM-901, technically is not at the level of the 801 and the Tera. As I’ve said it’s a more mainstream oriented sound, full and punchier bass. Something that can’t be said about the 801 and the Tera.
Hekowee
Sure do like the poster. The HD-800’s are my primary cans. Any ideas on how to get an image, or copy?
Mike
Well if you’re in Jakarta I can give you a copy (A4)
Hekowee
Well, round trip airfare to Jakarta would cost about as much as the HD-800’s. Hmmmmm, I’m going to have to think about this one. Thanks for the offer, and even more, thanks for all the great reviews.
Hekowee
Found an excellent photo of the poster on Facebook, copied to iPhoto, small edit and printed on photo paper…..voila, have the poster. Plan to have it framed, and hung in my listening room, mostly thanks to you. Here’s the link…. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=474278635978201&set=a.291278164278250.68194.109645602441508&type=3&theater
L.
Can I post that on Facebook please?
Hekowee
Sure, no problem.
L.
thanks!
Mike
Thank you
Darryn Harly Septalingga
which do you prefer between AK120 and Teclast T51? since they share the same configuration of their DAC (Dual Wolfson WM8740)… and for DAP choice, between Fiio X3 and Teclast T51, which should i choose? mostly i listen to japanese song and also progressive metal or nu metal like Dream Theater, Slipknot, or System of a Down… btw nice report, and thx before 😀
Mike
The configuration is same but sound is very different. I think the ak120 should have enough speed for your music but I haven’t really tried it specifically with thqt
Fabio_Rocks
The Shure Se846 is so nice! They also have implemented a system that allows to tune the treble +-2,5 db. Mike do you think it will be better than FitEars 335?
ohm image
Mike, next time you are in Tokyo for a show, I’d love to meet up. We go to the same shows and I’m told by mates that you are there, but… finding anybody there is quite the chore.
Great round up.
Mike
Thanks I will send you an email. 🙂
Kenny Chew
I did not read any bias, so Mike your initial impression of Shure SE846 was very truthful. I agreed to that 846 pricing indeed too high. Any price of $750 and below will be more appropriate. (under cut your mentioning price by another $50, haha..)
Mike
Thanks, Kenny. I have a feeling market price is going to be around $1k maybe a bit lower
Eric Thompson
Hmm so is the 846 still really really laid back and sort of lacking in the highs like the 215’s and 535’s? I didn’t mind it with the 215’s but in the $500 535’s I was sort of disappointed.
Coll. IEm
I don’t know why you still think 801 better than 901
but I have both 901 sound better in every way even with mp3 .