BACK TO THE FUTURE FRIDAY: Portable Minidisc

Back to the future Friday is a monthly column where Headfonia shines light on the awesome past.

 

#2 Minidisc portable recorders

Long before I discovered the iPod shuffle and began reading Headfi, I wiggled my typing toes in the murky waters of minidisc.org, arguing which recorder sounded best, offered the best concert-taping capabilities, skip protection, ad nauseum. In general, we were a smug holier-than-thou group that masturbated the niche soul in each of us.

Real MD users hated — and I believe I can use this word without distorting its definition — MP3 players. We hated Cowon, Meizu, Creative, and so on, equally. But above all, we hated Apple. Some of us probably still do.

We had both rhyme and reason. Our players/recorders of choice were infinitely more elegant. We could take disks with us, record our favourite albums on the fly, swap music/disks, and no computer was necessary. Concerts? All you needed was a good microphone, microphone amp, and balls. MD recorders had noiseless outputs, featured on-the-fly renaming, great battery life. Hell, they even had gapless playback- something that until today eludes many players. Then the iPod came along and transformed the MP3 player market. From that day on, our party got rained on.

It took me a while to see the writing on the wall. MD, for all its quirks and tangle of proprietary shit, it was the perfect media system. And, it always would be. Rap on wood.

I purchased my first recorder from the ON/OFF (RIP) in Vetlanda. In rapid succession, I purchased another five, plus two player-only units. I had one break down, another blow up after the salesman snuck in the improper charger unit. I went to professional audio supply shop near Pearson International Airport to pick up professional-grade disks. I even purchased pre-recorded albums on read-only disks. Damn.

But 2006 was the last year I seriously called myself a heavy MD user. I would be lying if I said I didn’t miss some of what MD could do. And, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t really miss carefully recording albums, getting to know my music in new, intimate ways, and spending hours every week lining up themed playlists for the next five days. In no way whatsoever is this essay evidence of my having relapsed. I swear it. Honest to TOC.

But here’s what I love about MD:

Looks

Early MP3 players from crapanies like iRiver, Compaq, and Creative, were shitty devices that stole design cues from egg McMuffins and cigarette cartons. The idea was to redesign the wheel. MP3 must not in any way look or act like it was designed for music (or to be used by normal humans).

MD players and recorders, however, followed the general Aesthetic of hi-end CD players out there. Sony pioneered the use of magnesium alloys. Players had slim in-line remotes, and boasted excellent machining, tight tolerances, and beautifully humming engines.

They were flashy, but in a good way. Yes, there were some ugly players, too. Early Sharp and Panasonic designs had no style. Funnily enough, Aiwa (Sony’s cheaper sibling), served up tasteful, yet aggressive designs that appealed to the bridge portaphile.

In all cases, MD players and recorders were backed up by forward-thinking design departments.

Cost of ownership

Not to rub salt into old wounds, but early MP3 players cost an arm and a leg. And you were stuck a measly dozen megabytes or so. MD disks were small, cost about 1$,  and you could pack dozens in your bag. If one broke, you didn’t have to repair the MD player or recorder. Just re-record a disk. They have no analogue even today. Sure, you can purchase a removable SD or other card, but you aren’t paying 1$, and you most certainly can’t personalise that card without it getting stuck in your AK.

Because MD disks were small, rather robust, and as easy to play as a CD, they served as excellent backups for your expensive CD collection. Just record your favourite disks onto MD. Voila! your optical digital investment was ensured to last. MD disks were protected by plastic jackets that remained closed to the elements. When inserted into an MD recorder/player, a small lever forced open the metal read tab, exposing the CD-like optical surface of the MD.

I bet you were about to point out that MD players/recorders could be expensive. You are right. And they were. But prices plunged downward as the MD user base rose. Couple that with sturdy hardware, and inexpensive media, and you had a rather economical way of enjoying your CD collection while out and about. Eventually, basic players could be had for around 100$.

Exact CD copies

While MD recorders could record any analogue signal they were sent, and most 16-bit digital signals, they were made to backup your CD collection. They safe-guarded your precious investment. While the audio signal was compressed in a proprietary codec Sony called ATRAC, actual compression was about 1/5, and averaged 292kbps. Late iterations of the ATRAC codec did a very good job of preserving the audio signal. Still later versions allowed for higher compression. MDLP2 allowed you to pack the equivalent of 2 CDs onto one minidisc. MDLP4 was just crap.

But the best part was that your CD — in all its hidden-track, gapless, run-on glory, was preserved. You didn’t have to run the file through EAC or MAX. You didn’t have to fuss with ID3 tags, or CUE sheets to make sure gaps would wouldn’t show up in your music.

Your CD was preserved, with very few errors, exactly on the MD. And it needed no computer.

Ease of use

That last point deserves a mini-essay of its own. All you needed was an MD recorder and a cable. Plug them up to your source, sync them, and go. Lickety split. No need to digitise downloads, find album art, work with EAC. This had enormous advantages in cost, too. Today, we think MP3 players are cheap. In reality, our music collections sit on the enormously convoluted backbone of: internet & connection, computer, encoders, proprietary software, non-removable batteries, and much much more. On top of all that, you have to be rather fluent with one or more operating systems plus a suite of other, unrelated software titles, in order to master listening to music from an MP3 player.

The financial and educational costs necessary to support fidelity playback and enjoyment of music from an MP3 player are astronomically more expensive than supporting an MD collection.

Of course, NetMD (the bastard child of MD and MP3) introduced computer interfaces, promising to open MD to a new generation of listener that preferred going through hoops in order to listen to his or her music. But NetMD sucked. Big time. MDs never were meant to be used like removable memory. Nor were they meant to be used like MP3 players. The simplicity they offered — and nearly flawlessly delivered — was unprecedented.

It continues on page 2

BACK TO THE FUTURE FRIDAY: Portable Minidisc
5 (100%) 2 votes

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Back before he became the main photographer for bunches of audio magazines and stuff, Nathan was fiddling with pretty cool audio gear all day long at TouchMyApps. He loves Depeche Mode, trance, colonial hip-hop, and raisins. Sometimes, he gets to listening. Sometimes, he gets to shooting. Usually he's got a smile on his face. Always, he's got a whisky in his prehensile grip.

44 Comments

  • Reply June 20, 2014

    Dave Ulrich

    I never did the MD thing, so this was an interesting history lesson for me. By the by, can you give a sneak peek on the DX90? I saw that it uses the same chip as the Concero HD and got excited.

    • Reply June 21, 2014

      ohm image

      MD was huge where I used to live: Sweden, and as big or bigger in Japan. When I went back to Canada, almost no one had it. Getting service (as you would need it eventually) was difficult, but staying the course was what I did.

      It was a matter of pride.

      • Reply June 21, 2014

        Dave Ulrich

        DX90?

        • Reply June 21, 2014

          ohm image

          Will be reviewing that in a few weeks. Till then, stay on topic 😉

          (It’s pretty good, btw.)

          It’s output is at least as good as the AK240 (http://ohm-image.net/opinion/audiophile/rmaa-summary-ak240-dx90-md-dr7-ipod-shuffle) but output quality isn’t everything.

          • Reply June 21, 2014

            Dave Ulrich

            I was thinking about going for that review. You beat me to it.

            I remember when MD was a thing here in the US… for a few months maybe. A few were heralding it as the replacement to CDs, but most people just weren’t having it. I remember some albums came out for it. I might have had a friend who had one.

            Staying the course for pride. Sounds like the people who refused to abandon laser-discs in favor of DVD.

            • Reply June 24, 2014

              ohm image

              Dave VS Nathan DX90 review, I can see it coming. I’m obliged.

              I lived in the USA when I first heard about MD. I was twelve or something. We moved to Canada when I was fifteen and I had forgotten all about it. Then I went back to Sweden for a bit and bought my first unit. I was a changed man- at least until I discovered that he iPod wasn’t as bad as all the MD people were saying it was.

              The next thing to change me is the Mezzo Hifi modification of the AK100. (Oh, and we’ll get that bad boy up, too.)

              • Reply June 24, 2014

                Dave Ulrich

                Naw that’s ok. At this point, I am stoked to read your review.

    • Reply July 23, 2018

      kris

      I had myriad of MP3 players from back in the days, i never looked at MD because as much as i like them they were to expensive for me to buy, but those desires to own one sticks with me.

      I always thought they as an older generation technology, would sound worse than the newer more technically advanced specification.

      But oh boy was i surprised, i had my first HiMD units its MZ RH910 and i used sonic stage to transfer my MP3s to that thing…

      pairing it with my old AKG 242HD, after just few minutes of head scratching in disbelief… enough to say that i put my brand new Sony NWA-45 along with my Cowon D2 back to the display box i have made for them… its not they sounded inferior or anything, but i just fell in love with the sound characteristic that MD unit delivers.

      and soon enough over the span of 1 year i own 7 units of player & recorder and 2 desktop units. i noticed each have their own color and character in sound… some i like more than the others.

      My friends calls em poison…

      • Reply July 23, 2018

        ohm image

        Thanks for the comment, Kris. One thing very few, to no MD players aimed for was linear or neutral sound character. Many had slow roll offs up top to keep tizzy out of the treble, and about 75-90% of portable MD players bump up bass by at least 2dB, as much as 4dB, probably to offset the sound of earphones, which were horrible back when MD debuted. For this reason, there is an incredible idiosyncratic stage to deal with and players with sounds ranging from smooth, to ones with almost no stereo separation at all. For people that don’t care about ultimate fidelity, I think MD has a LOT to offer. I’m in that camp as a listener, but as a reviewer, I have a lot of problems with my position.

  • Reply June 21, 2014

    George Lai

    Like Dave, I never did the MD thing, nor in fact the DAT thing. Somehow the recordable formats for me jumped from cassette to CD-R.

    • Reply June 21, 2014

      ohm image

      I started with DAT, did DCC, and ended up with MD. It was smaller, less prone to stretch errors, and the disks were indestructable. Totally worth it.

    • Reply June 21, 2014

      ohm image

      BTW, George, the MD-DR7 had a balanced headphone output. I need to add that to the review. It was the first mass-produced portable to do balanced. All Sharp ‘Auvi’ players came with re-badged, balanced Sennheiser MX300 earphones. Awesome.

      • Reply June 21, 2014

        George Lai

        That’s interesting to know. Mind you, I’m not sure my ears are even balanced 😉

  • Reply June 21, 2014

    spencer_chan

    Man I remember saving like crazy as kid to buy my mzr55.

    I went digging for it at my parents house and never did find it….

    • Reply June 21, 2014

      ohm image

      You had the MZR55? I had the MZR37, which looked like a 1970’s deck. They shared the same internal hardware.

      • Reply June 23, 2014

        spencer_chan

        Oh Jesus I found my mzr55!

        Now to find the power charger and the gumstick battery or the external pack….

        • Reply June 23, 2014

          ohm image

          Time to MD party. I had the MZ-R37, which internally was the same as the 55, but had noticeably worse sound in a few areas, though was a bit more dynamic in stereo separation.

  • Reply June 22, 2014

    Peter Janušič

    This was my first MD player which was also a recorder with digital output:

    https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7059/7154371090_eafcb5e1bc_z.jpg

    Unfortunately my sister threw it aways about 10 years ago. So much for lending audio devices to women…

    I later got the slimmest MD player in the world, a Panasonic player, of which model name I can’t remember. It was just slightly bigger than the MD itself with optional external battery.

    Had some good nineties rap music on dozens of MDs and dance music as well.

    Still have this Original MD.

    • Reply June 23, 2014

      ohm image

      Shucks, that image is awesome. Did you take that?

      • Reply June 23, 2014

        Peter Janušič

        I found it on the web. I don’t think I had a digital camera back then. Mine was the same, cost a fortune.

        • Reply June 23, 2014

          ohm image

          Thanks. I don’t think this was taken with a digital camera. The lighting and processing screams 90’s LF.

  • Reply June 22, 2014

    Peter Janušič

    So hard to put images to this site, it boggles my mind on how to do it.
    There should be another image in this post which I cannot see….
    Edit: after edit its there now…

    • Reply June 22, 2014

      ohm image

      It’s been yonks since I’ve seen one of htese pre-recorded MDs. I had Simon & Garfunkel: Bridge Over Troubled Water.

  • Reply June 23, 2014

    Newob86

    There was so much promise in the MD system back in 90s and early 00s. It was small and packed with high sound quality (at that time). However, as the competition famed out from MP3, MD fell just in couple of years. I own about 4 MD players include the last Hi-MD model from Sony. As a MD lover I am, I could say MD brought me more excitement than any other portable audio players I have ever owned. I cannot agree more with all the disadvantages this platform has in your review. But back in that time, MD is just simply fun to me. I won’t forget that kind of enjoyment that I had the first time I listen to this level of sound from a gadget inside the pocket of my chino pans. Thanks you guys for bringing back all those good memories.

    • Reply June 24, 2014

      ohm image

      Not to mention that recording an MD in real time, titling it, and then listening got you closer to your music than ever. Today we download and may listen to our music. But back then, we knew our music inside and out, even which title letters were capitalised or not.

      • Reply June 24, 2014

        Newob86

        Agreed, it was a lot effort to keep all the tracks in all the MD disks to be correct. Hell lots of works to manage tracks back then. But as you indicated, this is how MD made us attached to those music.

        • Reply June 29, 2014

          ohm image

          I used to know every word of every song I listened to. It just took so long to do everything that I was so passionate about knowing my music.

  • Reply June 24, 2014

    heatofamatch

    I was heavily involved in MD (and minidisc.org etc) at the time. Now I look back and it’s all just a heavily romanticized dream. Even for nostalgia’s sake, cassette portables beat MD hands down.

    • Reply June 24, 2014

      ohm image

      So, we’re brothers. I wasn’t an active poster at minidisc.org, but I spend hours poring over new information, comparing battery life, hoping one unit (that I was about to purchase) sounded better than another. Back in those days, we didn’t have knowledgeable websites or reviewers to compare and give feedback, which is a shame.

  • Reply June 29, 2014

    Anthony O'Brien

    I have a Sony MZR35 and a JE440 deck hooked to my hifi. I like to occasionally play around with MD. I also still own a perfect Sony WM DC-2 cassette Walkman which I still use. Sad eh!

    • Reply June 29, 2014

      L.

      not sad, cool 😉

    • Reply June 29, 2014

      ohm image

      MZR35 was a great recording deck, bested in build quality only by the MZR50 (expensive now), but not in sound quality. Hold onto that bad boy.

  • Reply June 29, 2014

    SallyMaeSusan

    Great article.
    I never had a MD player but this was very enjoyable.
    The Sony Walkman (original) was my first portable and I loved it. Now, I have a Classic 160 and an iPhone and I love the musical performance of these devices – almost everything in ALAC and with Ety’s and Shures to listen with.
    I won’t, however, be jumping onto the ‘hi-res’ bandwagon; the all pervasive smell of snake-oil and my old ears won’t allow it. My God, we live in a wonderful technological age!

  • Reply August 17, 2014

    Back Row

    One very important thing people seem to forget about; when the battery went dead in your MD portable you could just change it and more often than not it was a common AA cell or two. Let’s see you try that with an MP3 player.
    I bought the first generation iPod Nano and returned it within 5 minutes.
    “Where’s the battery?” I asked only to be told that it didn’t have one. Not wanting to have an expensive paperweight after it would no longer hold a charge, I got my money back.

    • Reply August 17, 2014

      L.

      So very true

  • Reply August 20, 2014

    BaasTurbo

    I still have my MZ-R90! Oh, the memories! I even bought an MD car headunit when I turned 18 – it was perfect. I could carry dozens of cartridges in the car without the worry of scratching or warping them, nobody could steal my (back then €20 a pop) CD collection and it sounded way better than cassette.

    Thank you for making me feel old!

    • Reply August 26, 2014

      ohm image

      The MZ-R90! That was quite late in the MD game. Sony was killing it by then. I was a little ahead of you in years, but lacked a car. Still do.

  • Reply December 11, 2014

    DeepGroove

    Lieven, I am listening to my MZ-R70 right now with the Spiral Ears SE-5. Thought it does not have the accuracy and detail of my AK240, it sounds much more analog and sweet. I enjoy using it and miss sound like that.

  • Reply December 12, 2017

    roxics

    My only regret when it comes to MD, is that I didn’t stick with the format longer. I bought my first portable player/recorder in 1999 and since I was both a young adult and a truck driver at the time, it was a great way to take downloaded MP3s with me on the road and do some voice memos while driving.
    I loved it, but it was quickly overshadowed by CD-Rs and then iPods. So I missed out on those later 80 minutes designer discs which sell now for over $5 a pop on ebay. Plus all those smaller colorful players with USB connections and HI-MD ability.
    Wish I would have stocked up on this stuff when it was still readily available at local stores. But I didn’t get back into MD until the after the format was discontinued and the prices of everything went up.

    The unfortunate thing about MD is that it came too late. It didn’t hit its price/performance stride until the early 2000s when no one cared anymore. Had it been introduced in 1985 and hit its stride in 1995, I think it would have been a major hit here in the US. The format really should have been the mixtape of the 1990s. In an alternate reality where it had hit its stride mid 90s, I could imagine teenagers passing MDs around to friends and girlfriends and indie grunge bands doing garage recordings on them to sell at local shows. Car decks with them that didn’t skip like crazy like those early CD decks.
    But in our reality, in 1995, portable player/recorders were way too expensive for most high school kids or people in general. Nobody wanted to buy just a player because most people had already started collecting prerecorded music on CD at that point. Plus if I remember right, prerecorded MDs were a little more expensive than CDs and they didn’t sound as good. So if you were already collecting CDs, why bother? Unless you could do your own recordings, but again that was too expensive still.

    That missed opportunity for the format is really sad in my opinion.

  • Reply December 13, 2017

    paul packer

    Well said. Minidisc is the format that should have taken over the audio world but somehow just missed the boat. I still have 2 full sized decks and several dozen recorded discs, and I intend to keep the format going as long as I can. It’s hard to think of another format more worthy that hit such a brick wall of indifference, but as you suggest it was the manufacturer’s fault with both pricing and timing. However, since we seem to be going back to the future with vinyl, maybe there’s a chance for Minidisc yet.

  • Reply July 23, 2018

    kris

    I had myriad of MP3 players from back in the days, i never looked at MD because as much as i like them they were to expensive for me to buy, but those desires to own one sticks with me.

    I always thought they as an older generation technology, would sound worse than the newer more technically advanced specification.

    But oh boy was i surprised, i had my first HiMD units its MZ RH910 and i used sonic stage to transfer my MP3s to that thing…

    pairing it with my old AKG 242HD, after just few minutes of head scratching in disbelief… enough to say that i put my brand new Sony NWA-45 along with my Cowon D2 back to the display box i have made for them… its not they sounded inferior or anything, but i just fell in love with the sound characteristic that MD unit delivers.

    and soon enough over the span of 1 year i own 7 units of player & recorder and 2 desktop units. i noticed each have their own color and character in sound… some i like more than the others.

    My friends calls em poison…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.