The sound
Like Digitalism’s album, Lyra is alternatively bassy and melodic. It is bassy enough to retrieve the yawningly low-voiced, low sound pressure intro to Markus Schulz’s Mainstage. But it doesn’t bottom out, or when pressed by heavier, faster bass riffs. Neither does it bloom or whinge. Its ceramic housing nearly perfectly governs all the baddies that can creep out of a dynamic driver earphone.
The bass to mids transition zone is frictionless. Low mids are tame. Detail picks up from just below the vocal band, and works into a pretty good potage of contrast and bump maps from there on up. That band is also the most space-detailed, loading the eardrum with fine attacking-edge gradients rather than huge microcontrast.
Treble extends well to the top, but not with heaps of energy or contrast against the lows. Well, that is with the foamies. With silicon tips, it is both contrastier and more energetic, but not by leaps and bounds. I reckon that treble heads will probably move to something with more of a U-shape or an obvious upper mid spike. That said, songs that rely on ephemeral electronic cymbals such as Richard D. James’s Milkman are perfectly suited to Lyra, which keeps extension rather than raw energy in its sites.
Essentially, upper midrange to lower treble elements have the most high-frequency energy. Detail is good below and above that, but by sheer weight, Lyra’s high end is just this side of neutral. Given two or three more decibels of sound pressure and some people probably would complain that it is too bright. Two decibels less and others would complain that it isn’t bright enough.
But it is. As I intimated, Lyra runs pretty flat, but with a greater portion of weight thrown behind bass-to-lower-mids than to upper edges. It is nearly the quintessential everyone-pleaser. A mix between the HD600 and HD650, but with less mid-bass, and with mids that are a little wetter than the HD600.
The thing that keeps it from being the everyone pleaser is that it is just a tad laid back. At the odd time, bass runs a tad hot. Like I said, it never bottoms out, but when fed enough _I Love You Dude_, it congests a little.
Back to back with the Dita The Answer, Lyra presses more into the bass, pulling up a larger, louder bottom end. Dita is more contrasty top to bottom, but has duller vocals and a more compressed sound stage.
The Ultrasone IQ Pro, on the other hand, is closer to the Lyra, but with less low-end power.
Lyra is best suited to ambient electronic and space, to progressive house and trance, to hip-hop, to jazz, vocal, and whatever the hell John Denver and the Cure were up to. It’s an earphone with a signature meant for the epicurean picker and chooser. If you’re hardcore into a single genre, make sure you’re into something that either sounds amazing with muscular bass, and certainly anything with either electronic or stringed pianos. Both sound fantastic. Hardcore trance-heads may find the bass just a bit too powerful for long ASOT sessions.
The stage Lyra throws is wide, but not super tall. Its Z-axis detail and gradients are true-to-life pretty like what you’re used to hearing from your ears. If you want extra spin, you need an earphone with a U-shaped signature. As for the angle of view it projects out of your skull, I reckon it’s 80º and very 2,1-esque.
End words
Lyra is a fine debut earphone. I prefer it to the Dita, and if it fit better, I’d likely put my Ultrasone IQ down. The only thing I wish it had more of is top-end bite. Despite being a treble head, I’m down with its bass as is. And thankfully (or not) I don’t speak for everyone. With that one very personal proviso, I can recommend Lyra for people that enjoy it thick down there, good extension, and relax where it counts.
Oh, and you had better pick up a different cable. (Oh, and don’t forget to rate this review)
Dave Ulrich
Sounds like a good one. Nice review!
ohm image
It is a very nice one. And it is as solid as a diamond.
soundblast
You really prefer them to Ditas?:)
ohm image
In general, yes. Better fit, better isolation, wider sound stage. The Dita’s higher contrast is better for trance, so the sound preference opinion is where I have give and take for both.
I much prefer the method Campfire Audio have taken. I imagine that people that really love the HD600 to death probably will love Lyra more than Dita. Those that are DT880 people may prefer the sound of the Dita. That said, the Lyra is a better-built earphone.
Being a pre-production model, I can’t say if its sound will again change, but even if it does, I’m confident it won’t massively change. As of now, I’m very impressed.
soundblast
Thanks for your reply, i loved Dita and i want a new dynamic,this might be the one:)
As long as i can buy it here in uk/europe,not easy at the mo.
Jeff
Very nice! I wish the pricing was below $500 though especially with the release Dunu’s D2000J with a dynamic driver plus two BA drivers which is getting great reviews on Head-fi.
But that design and the case are a killer. 🙂
ohm image
Indeed. Honestly, I can’t imagine how or why Campfire would price it below what they did. It is sturdy, pretty, robust and perfectly branded.
cyph3r
Hi folks,
Beryllium driver? sounds cool, but as far as I know beryllium is a highly toxic metal (with great properties though. I hope this is an alloy of some sort with beryllium, otherwise I would not stick those into my ears.
dalethorn
Just don’t swallow. Keep away from children. Most of our electronics are hazardous inside. If you ever shorted a lithium battery and didn’t get hurt, you’re lucky.
cyph3r
Its true that many electronics equipment or parts still contain (potentially) hazardous elements or compounds. But for that reason initiatives like RoHS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_of_Hazardous_Substances_Directive were kicked off to reduce or remove them e.g. lead or cadmium.
And besides oral bioavailability, subtances are also absorbed through skin or small enough particles can be inhaled.
I dont want to spoil an innovative product (I am sure they use a beryllium alloy because of its very good material properties), just to raise a bit of consumer awareness. The supplier is responsible to inform consumers if there is any risk and at what level. And the consumer is responsible to think a bit more critical from time to time. That’s all.
dalethorn
Early efforts to remove lead resulted in Tin Whiskers, which for some agencies were an absolute disaster. Perhaps that’s no longer an issue, but it would be good to know the truth, not just a hand-waving denial.
digitldlnkwnt
and that happened when MFTRs cheaped out and went to tin instead of copper for there motherboard traces. theres a lot of good articles on the Tin Whiskers issue.
ohm image
I’ve chosen not to nibble on my earphones.
digitldlnkwnt
I just got the Lyra and I have been using it with my DX90 amp set to mid – thick, powerful bass that feels like it could kick a hole in a Corolla. I like the way these work together. If you dig house, hiphop, drum and bass anything with a bass line you should check these out. They are really forgiving with older recordings, especially recordings that were done before compression became common place. and the imaging feels so much more natural then compare to the sets of BA based IEM’s I have even if the contrast between sounds/instruments isn’t as stark as my BA based units. Very happy with these – thank you Campfire and ALO.
Headfonia_L.
And thank you Headfonia? 😉
digitldlnkwnt
And of course Headfonia! For the excellent reviews. It be interesting to see what kind of headphone the editors/contribute of this forum would come up with. Lots of different tastes – but lots of similar ones too.
Ave Deus
Really really having a hard time between Lyra and IE800, so many things that’s not rightly done on the IE800 design, but done perfectly in Lyra, but is the sound quality really better on the Lyra?
dalethorn
What are the main things not right on the IE800?
Ave Deus
Some things that many people find as cons on IE800’s design, like non-removable cable, unnecessary 2.5 jacks on the split that weigh down the buds, especially with not “over the ear” design, seems fixed or perfected in Lyra. As Ken from ALO hinted, they design the Lyra based on the IE800, takes what’s good and remove what’s not good. The tonal on the IE800 itself is one of the superb for IEM, and not so many review yet for the new Lyra as it’s just released, that’s what makes me think hard before getting one, but if the tonal quality is on par with IE800, I think choosing Lyra over IE800 is a no brainer.
dalethorn
I remember that the IE800 cable from earpiece to ear is pretty short and some users just could not accomodate it. It barely fit me OK. I hope you get a chance to try the Lyra.
Ave Deus
Dale, in your opinion, if you can only have one, which one of the two that you will pick? Have you got the chance to compare both of them? Thank you
dalethorn
No – I rarely do IEMs, I just recall that the IE800 fit OK, I loved the single-driver sound, which is a very rich sound, a little bit ‘V’-shaped. The oval eartips with the extra screens in them fit my ear canals better than any other eartips I’ve used. So I can only recommend the IE800 if it fits you – changing to different eartips would defeat the design I think. The IE800 cable, between the earpieces and the ‘Y’, was very microphonic, so you would probably need 2 (not just one) clothing clips for outdoor use. I don’t like the Lyra’s looks at all, but if it fits good and sounds good, it might be a better deal.
Ave Deus
Thanks Dale, really appreciated.
TheIEM coll.
can you compare the to flare r2 pro ?
ohm image
I’m sorry, I don’t own that earphone.
SoundGood
It is almost 5 times the price of Panasonic HJE-900 which has a same design trait but was out 5 years ago.
ohm image
What design trait is the same?
SoundGood
Same Zirconia housing dynamic iems with interchangeable wires.
ohm image
I’ve heard them. They are nice. But they were not the first ceramic body earphone. The same could be said of any earphone with a ceramic body and interchangeable cables.
Lyra is most definitely not the same earphone, the same shape, or even a similar earphone to the Panasonic HJE-900.
SoundGood
I have heard Lyra too but not as impressed. Regarding ceramic housings, my Sony 484G was one of the first but the Panny should be the first Zirconia.
SoundGood
And the HJE900 is interesting and atleast, imho, not worse than the Aurisonics ASG 1 plus gold of mine.
SoundGood
go lay your hands on the Panas and you won’t regret!
skeemr
Had a pair of Westone 3’s that just died. I liked the sound signature of those… was thinking of replacing them with SM64s or the Lyra’s. Would you say those are in same ballpark? Any preference between them?
Rich
I own the Lyra IIs and they sound as advertised which is what I was looking for. They also fit better than my Shure SE846s. One point nobody discussed is the scalability of the Lyra IIs. They sound very good plugged directly into my Sony ZX2 but are taken to another level when plugged into my desktop Erzetich Bacillus Tilia headphone. The midrange opens up, bass tightens up and is better defined and the soundstage is bigger more like a full size headphone. Of all my headphones including my XCs the Lyra IIs seem to scale the best.