First Impression: CEC HD53N

My other attempt in describing the HD53N sound would be to compare it with the Jazz at the Pawnshop CD. Okay, I’m sure not too many people have compared an amplifier with a CD before, and this is probably the first of such comparisons in the world of audio, but bear with me. The HD53N really reminded me of the sound of the recording in the Jazz in the Pawnshop. Jazz at the Pawnshop still remains one of the most highly regarded jazz recording due to its sonic qualities. If you’ve heard the CD, then you’ll know what I’m talking about. The soundstage sounds very warm and enveloping in the recording. That’s exactly how the soundstage sounds in the HD53N. The ambience is very clear, yet relaxed. It’s not too laid back though, and you’ll find that some instruments to sound really intimate in the recording. Even on a mediocre system, the superior recording will display a very distinct separation between the instruments. All those great qualities that I found on the recording of Jazz at the Pawnshop, is exactly the same kind of sound that I’m hearing in the HD53N, even when I’m not playing Jazz at the Pawnshop. The soundstage is warm and large, the instrument separation very distinct, the mood is relaxed yet it remains intimate: that’s exactly the HD53N sound.

The only thing that I find to lack in the CEC is impact and PRaT. It has a decent impact and PRaT, but I would not say that it’s the best in the category. If you are a vocal, smooth jazz, or audiophile jazz lover, then the CEC has just the perfect qualities for your music. If your music is aggressive and needs powerful impact, I suggest you look to the Burson HA-160.

The HD53N is a great sounding solid state amplifier, with a beautiful build quality, intuitive controls, and it also provides balanced drive. I wish my Beta22 was built as nicely as the HD53N and comes with a nice display in the front panel. But even when talking about sonic performance, in some ways, I find it to be better than the Beta22 when it comes to projecting a more distinct instrument separation and a clearer image of the soundstage. The Beta22 ultimately still wins in giving a more “real” image of the music, and having more weight especially in the instruments. So, I would not hand over the crown to the HD53N just yet. But overall, the HD53N is very very good, and for less than the price for the parts of a balanced Beta22 build (my Beta22 was roughly $1,200-$1,300 in parts alone), you get a superb sounding amplifier without the hassle of DIY. Moreover, the Beta22 also requires a pretty high end source to shine, whereas I was really able to enjoy music with just an Ipod Classic feeding the HD53N. Looking at the big picture, the HD53N does seem like a very good buy.



System used for review:
Headphones: Sennheiser HD800
Amplifier: CEC HD53N
Source: Ipod Classic 120GB

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

42 Comments

  • Reply May 8, 2010

    Eugen

    I have it. I agree with your review for the most part, but sorry to say, If you didn't hear it balanced you have no idea how it really sounds.:)

    Nice photo skills!

    • Reply May 8, 2010

      Mike

      Hi Eugen, nice to hear from an owner's perspective! Yes it's a shame I didn't have my balanced cable with me then. Perhaps you can share a balanced to SE impression on the HD53N?

      Just to clarify, as I didn't have the means to test it, can you feed SE signal and get balanced out from the HD53N?

  • Reply May 10, 2010

    Eugen

    Yes, you can feed it SE signal and balanced out.

    My main headphone is the Grado HF2 … balanced, the CEC HD53N it doubles it's soundstage, tightens up the bass, but most of all it lifts a veil from the music, the detail is unbelievable – at first I thought it's got to be brighter but it's not, the listening fatigue is lower despite of the incredible detail and airiness.

    To me the amp in it's SE form is MUCH worse than balanced. Is the beta22 the same?

    • Reply May 10, 2010

      Mike

      I'm familiar with the Grado HF2, and one of the weakness of the HF2 is soundstage, and if balanced on the HD53N really opens up the soundstage, then it's a must to drive these balanced!

      When you say that SE is MUCH worse than balanced, I can see what you mean. I was listening to a balanced UM Mage and JH13 Pro the other day on the Protector, and even on a small amp as the Protector, you don't want to listen in single ended after you've listened to balanced. The difference is enough to say "night and day". But at the end of the day, amplifier sinergy, ultimately is still more important than having a balanced drive.

      The SE form of Beta22 is not as good as the Balanced version. Still I won't say that it's MUCH worse, because in single ended it's already a very good amp.

      Cheers.

  • Reply May 10, 2010

    Eugen

    Also, what I noticed on all other solid state amps I heard except this one, they're all grainy compared with the CEC … even if some of them have a more dynamic sound.

    I didn't hear the Beta22 but I might hear the AudioGD ROC … I know a guy that has one .. maybe those two can compare.

    • Reply May 10, 2010

      Mike

      I Eugen,
      The CEC does sound exceedingly smooth, so it's logical that other solid states sound grainier compared to it. Even the Beta22 is not as smooth as the CEC. That said, the CEC sound is not for everyone, and some people might want a little grainier sound and a little more PRaT if they're listening to Rock.

  • Reply May 27, 2010

    Jay K

    That looks like an interesting amp. Would be great if you could take some more internal pics. I’m curious if it’s a truly balanced amp.

    BTW, do you know the price that Jaben is selling?

    • Reply May 28, 2010

      Mike

      Unfortunately I don't own it. Doubt they'll let me open it up to take internal photos. Perhaps someone else can help there.

      It should be a true balanced amp, otherwise how can you drive all four signals?

      The price should roughly be U$1,000.

  • Reply July 30, 2010

    Stephen

    Hi,

    An interesting review.

    Is it precise on details but analytical yet boring like many other Japanese amps? I'm more into musical one.

    • Reply July 30, 2010

      Mike

      Hi Stephen,
      The HD53N is nothing analytical or boring. It is one of the most pleasing amplifiers I've heard, and the soundstage and instrument separation is amazing on this amp, even only running single ended.

      • Reply August 4, 2010

        Stephen

        Thanks for the reply Mike.

        Is it wide or deep 3D soundstage? More into forward or laid-back?

        Do you have any other recommendation for a balanced musical sounding amp other than this CEC?

        Thanks Mike, would really appreciate your reply.

        • Reply August 4, 2010

          Mike

          Hi Stephen. The soundstage is wide and deep 3D with very good separation. One of the best I've heard. More into laid back than forward (this was with the HD800 which tend to be more laid back than forward). It's an easy amp to like.

          At the moment, the only other recommendation I can make is the Beta22, but the CEC HD53N is quite special in its own regards, and is built better, and it cost less than the parts of a Balanced Beta22.

          • Reply August 12, 2010

            Stephen

            Hey Mike, sorry for the late reply.

            So it's SS amp but sounds like tubey?

            Anyway, have you heard RSA Apache, Eddie Current Balancing Act, or SPL Auditor? Yeah they are obviously much more expensive. But CEC is quite competitive compared to Beta22 in your review, I'm wondering where it stands against those giants?

            Thank you Mike.

            • Reply August 12, 2010

              Mike

              Hi Stephen,
              No I haven’t heard the Apache or the Balancing Act. I’ve always been interested in the Balancing Act, but no budget to get it. 🙁 The Auditor is very neutral as a monitoring amplifier, it may lack the usual flavoring that music listeners want in their amplifiers.

            • Reply August 13, 2010

              Mike

              Hi Stephen,
              Here is my review of the SPL Auditor and Phonitor: http://headfonia.com/spls-phonitor-and-audito

  • Reply August 18, 2010

    Albert

    Hello Mike,

    It's interesting that this amp is warm yet detailed. Does it presentation comparable (or maybe better) against tube amp in terms of warm, smooth, rich, liquid and lush sounds? I love delicate vocals.

    But I guess this solid state CEC win hands down in terms of dynamics, transients, separation and soundstage compared to tube amp, am I wrong?

    I got Woo or Little Dot in my mind by the way.

    Thanks Mike.

    • Reply August 20, 2010

      Albert

      No response Mike?

      Take your time 🙂

      Albert

    • Reply August 20, 2010

      Mike

      Sorry for the late reply Albert. Sometimes comments get buried and yada yada yada excuses… 😉

      Vocals should be delicate with this CEC. If you like a mellow, romantic presentation, then you would like this CEC. It may not be as liquid and lush as some tube amps, but if you really want a liquid and lush sound you'll be better off getting a tube amp with that signature.

      What I find to be unique is how the CEC can blend transparency and detail with a very warm and romantic sound. Often warm sounding amps are not as transparent as neutral sounding ones. Definitely one of the best attempt at combining the two characters on the CEC.

      It's a very good amp, but if you want me to compare it to a Little Dot or to a Woo, then I've got to do an A-B comparison to be sure. However compared to the Woo6 which I'm very familiar with, the CEC remains unique. The Woo6 is more energetic compared to the CEC, but the CEC's presentation has a "grander" feel to it — bigger soundstage, instrument separation among other things.

      🙂

  • Reply October 9, 2010

    Karl

    Hi Mike,
    It may help to know that the CEC has a unique amplifier circuitry, so it might be not so surprising how this amp differs from the mainstream. I know other CEC amplifier and got the same impression as you described. To me the CECs doesn’t sound typically Japanese at all.
    Would you agree to say that it takes the best of both worlds: tube and solid state? Did you do the balanced check meanwhile as Eugen suggested? It seems there are more voices confirming a rather vast improvement.

    • Reply October 9, 2010

      Mike

      Hi Karl, yes the CEC HD53N successfully combined the best of tubes and solid state. I don't personally own the amp, so I can't try it out in balanced. 🙂

  • Reply October 9, 2010

    Mike

    Can anybody tell me what this is?

    http://www.phileweb.com/news/photo/201010/ippin-2

    • Reply October 25, 2010

      Karl

      Hi Mike,

      I was digging a little about CEC stuff. The pic. shows DA53N, a DAC with USB and a quite good headphone amp. It seems to be very popular in Japan.

      In Japan and Europe it seems it is openly known that the CECs are made and designed by Candeias which is German origin and has a manufacturing in China. Might explain the non Japanese sound.

      • Reply October 25, 2010

        Mike

        Interesting, Karl. They do print the Candeias company name on CEC gear, but I never really know where this company is based. In a way, I think the sound is still more Japanese than German. It's warm and romatinc sounding. Germans are not like that. 😀

        I think Lehmann amps have a true German sound. Precision, clarity, accuracy, and so on. 😀

        • Reply October 26, 2010

          Karl

          Hi Mike,

          This name is definitely Latin. There is a holiday place in Brasil called Candeias, but this is more for listening to wind and waves 🙂

          Just google the name and you found more brands made by them: AQVOX and B.M.C. audio, both in Germany. B.M.C. definitely worth a closer look.

          The Lehmann is not my favorite. I'm looking for an amp without so much specific German or whatever character. This is how I got caught by the CEC integrated amps.

          • Reply October 26, 2010

            Mike

            I know, Karl. I was just joking. 🙂

  • Reply October 28, 2010

    Tiago

    Hi Mike,

    I wonder if you have tried the CEC HD53 with low impedance phones such as JH13. Can this amp compete with tube amps such as WA2 ?. If not, do you have a solid state recommendation for the JH13?. Thanks. T

    • Reply October 28, 2010

      Mike

      Hi Tiago, I don't think the amplifier requirement for the JH13 is very high. I've personally never used the JH13 with big desktop amps like the WA2 or the HD53 CEC. I did try my UM Mage with the Beta22 once, just for fun, but it was way too impractical for everyday use. Besides, full size headphones make more sense with a desktop system.

  • Reply January 12, 2011

    Steve

    Mike, who sells the CEC HD53 in the USA? I'm looking for a SS amp to complement my tube amps (Zana Deux SE and Luxman SQ-N100). Currently my leading candidate is the Burson 160D. In reading your review of the Burson 160, I just became aware of the CEC amp and there has not been much discussion of this amp on Head-fi that I'm aware of. I currently own the LCD2, HE6, LA7000 (Lawton Audio modified D7000), HD800, T1, K340 and HD650. My musical interests are vocals, classic rock, and some jazz and blues. Between the Burson 160D and the CEC HD53, which do you recommend? I just discovered this site and I like your reviews. Thanks.

    • Reply January 13, 2011

      Mike

      Hi Steve,
      You can try audiocubes, they do carry the amp and I believe the price is right at $999: http://bit.ly/hmxEtw. Briefly between the Burson and the CEC HD53N:
      – CEC is more romantic, sweeter sounding, more tube-amp like.
      – Burson is more forward, aggressive, better PRaT.
      – CEC would be better for classic rock, vocals, jazz, and blues.
      – Burson would be better for progressive rock, alternative, electronics.

      I did the listening impressions of the CEC with the HD800. And so it should be able to drive the LCD-2, LA7000, T1, and HD650 quite well. However, I am not so sure about the HE-6. The Burson definitely can drive the HE-6 as I've tested it. The CEC does come with a speaker taps at the back, rated 18W at 4 ohms, so perhaps the HE-6 can be driven directly from the speaker taps.

  • Reply January 15, 2011

    Steve

    Mike,
    Does the CEC HD53N come in universal voltage for 120v operation in the USA or would I need a step up transformer? Since Audiocubes sells direct from Japan, if it doesn't have universal voltage capability then I would have to purchase a step up transformer. Thanks again.

    Steve

    • Reply January 15, 2011

      Steve

      Mike,
      Sorry but I meant I would need to buy a step down transformer for operation in the USA. Right?

      Steve

    • Reply January 15, 2011

      Mike

      Steve,
      I think CEC makes their product to cover global voltages, since they have distributors in almost every continent. I think it'll be best to email audiocubes and ask about what voltage you'll be getting. If there is a voltage mismatch, you can get a step/up/down anytime, but if that's the case, I'll probably try to find another distributor that can supply the correct voltage that you need.

  • Reply February 21, 2011

    allen

    could you drive k1000s out of the speaker taps?

    • Reply February 22, 2011

      Anonymous

      I suppose you can, with 50W of power. But I don’t have a K1000 and so I
      can’t test it. It should also work with the HE-6 I think.

  • Reply March 10, 2011

    jason

    Hi mike,
    great review. Have you ever tried this amp with cec’s headphone?
    It’s one of the best matchs i’ve ever heard. And i also think that
    If you didn’t hear it balanced you have no idea how it really sounds.

    My gear: Tl51x>dx71 mkii>hd53n>hp53 FB

    • Reply March 10, 2011

      Anonymous

      You lucky man! No, I have not tried any of the CEC headphone.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.