The Casual: Philips Fidelio M1

The Casual: Philips Fidelio M1

January 23, 2013 |  by  |  $100-$300, Portables  | 


Disclaimer: I received the Fidelio M1 sample from Philips Asia.

 

The Fidelio Line Up

The Fidelio M1 complements the bigger L1 and X1 Fidelios as the ultraportable model of the Fidelio line up. The bigger Fidelio L1 and X1 models have been reviewed previously on this site and I generally find my impression of all three Fidelio to be positive. What I didn’t really expect to hear is how different the sound signature of one Fidelio models to the next. Without the common styling and the Fidelio brand name, I wouldn’t even guess that the three headphones belong to the same manufacturer let alone the same brand line.

I do think that the designer has a clear purpose in setting the different sound signatures and that is to fit the use that each headphone was designed for. You have the Fidelio L1 is an excellent medium-sized headphone with good technicalities and musicality to back up its serious high quality look. Then you also have the full size X1 model that comes with a more fitting airy sound and with an overall bigger sound than the L1. Then finally we have the M1, the star of this review, with its design and build clearly made for a more casual use. Naturally enough, the sound presentation should be a more casual one.

 

Sound Impressions

The smooth and warm presentation is a successful recipe for portable outdoor listening. This is the kind of a sound that I enjoy to have on a casual walk outdoor. You get full mids, punchy bass and a relaxed treble. All these wrapped in a relatively forward sound signature. A casual headphone like the M1 doesn’t have to be filled with technicalities, instead I find it most important that the headphone has a wide genre bandwith to suit different music genres. And indeed the M1 is that headphone. The treble is soft and relaxed, the midrange always full and smooth, the bass is tight and punchy.

Really there is no better recipe for mainstream music listening than something like what the M1 presents. If you’re looking for technicalities, however, this is not really the headphone to go with. Although articulation is quite decent for something ultraportable like this, I can imagine people wanting a more spacious feel and more midrange and bass detail.

 

Pricing

What’s difficult to recommend about the M1 is its $199.99 price tag (the Amazon price I quoted is actually lower than general retail price). Don’t get me wrong, it’s a nice headphone, but I find it difficult to swallow that the bigger and technically more impressive L1 is only selling for $50 more. Not only to the bigger brother, but also to the competition out there, namely popular headphones like the Sennheiser HD25-1 and the Audio Technica M-50. I can argue that the M1′s 40mm driver is quite modern and sounds smoother than Sennheiser’s HD25-1. But in the overall scheme of sound, I really wouldn’t imagine comparing the M1 on the same line with headphones like the HD25-1 and the M-50.

 

End Words

Perhaps these are not fit for the technically demanding headphone enthusiasts, but I can imagine the M1 being popular with business travelers and casual users. It looks good and the build quality is solid, perhaps one of the most solid portables around. The pads are soft and plush, though being fully enclosed supra-aural pads, they are not as comfortable as the bigger L1. Most importantly I think the common crowd who’s not obsessed with bass will find the M1′s warm and analog sound signature pleasing. It’s one of those headphones that you can just pick up, listen, and enjoy without worrying about amplifier, source, or recording quality.

 


  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1250923044 George Lai

    I’m glad I went for the X1 :-)

  • http://www.facebook.com/Mohammaduf Mohammad Ashraf

    I own the Fidleio M1 and I also own the L1. I enjoy the M1 however as you rightly said it sound is not the same as L1 and rightly so it shouldn’t be due to the different style. I think the 40 mm had much better potential. If they reduce the selling price this to something like 149 it will be selling like hot cakes, but at the current asking price I always told my friends and relative to think of purchasing the L1 than this.

    I think the 40 mm had more potential than what I heard from the M1.

  • dalethorn

    I wouldn’t call the treble relaxed. I’d call it missing. It sounds just like the test graphs show it – shelved. I tried asking Kevin at Philips’ Facebook page about this, and he refused to answer, no doubt because he couldn’t explain how Philips could sell such a low-fidelity headphone for $250 USD (which is how much I paid). I pity anyone who orders this and has a big hassle and expense returning it. I sent mine to Marcus in Manila, and as I remember he dumped it pretty quickly.

    • http://www.headfonia.com Mike

      Thanks Dale.

      • dalethorn

        That reminds me to get in touch with Marcus and see if he found the magic with the M1. You never know.

        • headfonics

          Mixed much like Mike and yes price is a factor

      • dalethorn

        Could be I made a mistake on the source of the test graph. Innerfidelity’s curve on the M1 looks OK, even though it takes a dive above 9 khz. It must have been the Goldenears test that looked like my M1 sounded – very dull. Not the worst I’ve gotten – when the price on the ‘new’ Pioneer SE-MJ591 dropped to $200 at B&H, I got one of those. It sounded like a Beyer DT48 1960 version, but without the mids. No bass, no treble, no mids. Actually it did work, it just was devoid of any tone. Very strange. I wish Kevin at Philips Facebook would have answered my questions, then I wouldn’t have panned his M1. The M1 had a one-star review at the Apple store for several months, which had to hurt sales. All of that could have been prevented.

    • headfonics

      haha nope I have not, still with me and well overdue for a view :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/pjal84 Paul Laguna

    Sooooo…between the B&W P3 and the Fidelio L1…who comes out on top? I’m looking for something to replace my Senn HD238i’s (frail for lack of a better word, very disappointed). The big thing that puts the P3 out in front for me is that it is foldable which I’d really like considering in my car storage space is at a premium and I’ve actually had a chance to listen to the P3 and for a portable was quite impressed.

    • dalethorn

      I had 2 of the P3′s – black and white. I liked them, but they do have a more uneven midrange and more rolled-off highs than other headphones in that $200 USD price range, such as the ATH ESW9a or v-moda M80.

  • Gibran

    Hi Mike, how does M1 compare to portapro? From what I read, both have similar sound signature, correct me if I am wrong. And portapro is waay cheaper. How is M1 a much better headphone?