Sometimes we need to remind ourselves, that after all, the Omega2 and the HeadAmp KGSS combo is a $5,000 set up. When you’re up to that figure, your source better be a $1,000 DAC at the very least. That’ll put you up to $6,000. And you still haven’t gotten the best amplifier for the Omega2, as everyone knows that the HeadAmp BHSE is THE amp for the Omega2, and it will cost you a good $6,000. So, that’s $9,000+ for the whole set up.
I guess the problem with the Omega2 is that it costs quite a lot of money to get it properly amped. Some Omega2 owners have recommended Stax’s own SRM-717 driver unit, but I don’t think that the SRM-717 is still available to purchase brand new, and hunting an old unit can be a challenge. And when you get it, you know that you’re still not using the best amplifier there is for the Omega2.
Still, the Omega2 experience is very unique. Despite some of the shortcomings I mentioned earlier, the musicality is more than the sum of its parts, and the Omega2 will never fail to impress regardless of where you’re coming from. Yes, the HD800 is more extended, more detailed, and have a more realistic soundstage, but musicality is sometime quite far from technical performance. Playing a random playlist (with mixed genres), I do think that 8 out of 10 people will choose the Omega2 over the HD800.
Gear used for review:
Headphones: Stax Omega2 Mk2 (SR-007 Mk2), Stax SR-404 Limited Edition, Sennheiser HD800
Amplifiers: HeadAmp KGSS, AMB Labs 2ch-Beta22
Source: CEC TL51XZ
Interconnects: Transparent Balanced Musiclink Plus XLR (to KGSS). DIY Interconnect (to Beta22).
Matt
You made it sound like the omega 2 was the end of the road at the beginning of the article but by the end you made it sounds like you prefer the hd800? Was there any definitive winner in your book?
Mike
Hi Matt, I'm glad you asked that question. Sometimes writing reviews, gosh, are not easy, and I may lead people to the wrong impression. I probably need to edit my conclusion there.
I pointed out that the Omega2 has a limited extension (top and bottom) in comparison to the HD800. Detail is also less, and the thing with the soundstage coming from all around you but not the front. But I also said this:
I also want to quote the introduction part, where I said:
I think that's the highest praise I've given any headphone. Despite the technical shortcomings, what matters is how it plays the music. I can tell you that if I play a random playlist to ten people, 8 of 10 will probably choose the O2 over the HD800. It's just that good.
The conclusion is not very positive, true, and that's probably what gives you the negative impression. Should've ended the article a different way. Again, thanks for the question. I do appreciate you asking that.
Matt
Thanks for the detailed response Mike. I think the new ending does a great job of summing it up.
Mike
Thanks Matt.
Mike
I added some stuff to the conclusion, to avoid further confusion. I also added some small stuff to the part about the Frequency Balance.
Jose
Very nice review Mike. Thanks for doing such a great job every time!
Mike
Thanks Jose. We strive because of support from people like you. 🙂
Ian
Thanks for a great review. I've always wanted to try Stax gear but been frightened off by the cost which you mentioned in the concluding paragraphs. Just waiting to see comments over the next few months for a couple of new developments:
* New headphone from Stax – SR5-7 – http://www.stax.co.jp/Export/SR507e.html
* Woo Audio's Electrostatic Energiser – http://www.wooaudio.com/products/wee.html
Mike
If you want to start cheap, then I can recommend you the Koss ESP-950 (http://www.headfonia.com/koss-esp-950-electrostatic-system/), or the SR-2025 system (http://www.headfonia.com/stax-sr-202-welcome-to-electrostatics/). The Koss ESP-950 can be bought new for $648.46 along with the amplifier. The SR-2050A can be bought for $699.99 along with the amplifier.
Both earspeakers are actually very good performer, and the SR-202 on the SR-2050A system is probably still the favorite lambda for a lot of people. What they need is a better quality amplifier. The SRM1Mk2 amp I used for this review (http://www.headfonia.com/stax-sr-202-welcome-to-electrostatics/) is a good bang for the buck amplifier for Stax.
From what I heard, the SR507 isn't going to be cheap. 🙂
manaox
Nice review Mike, thanks for taking the time to write a detailed review and comparison.
Mike
Hey dude, haven't seen you back here for a while. Been busy with other things?
Budi
Mike, thought I may want to chip in a bit. Your article said that Mk2 solely available in black. This is not particularly correct. The black Mk2 is for export product whereas for domestic Japan, the Mk2 still comes in champagne color housing and brown cable. Just wanted to clarify
Mike
Thanks for the info, I'll add it in!
Budi
Mike, my apology, it actually comes in silver color for domestic market. Attached is the link http://www.stax.co.jp/Japan/sr-007a.html
Export market remains the same ,black on black pads/cable. Once again my apology
Mike
Thanks dude. I didn’t even check the website because I thought you’re the O2 expert. 😛
Ahok
Tried this yesterday, (soooo late lol)
and im pretty much agree with mike, that this is a more preferable headphone to most people, because its signature is easier to preceive for many people,
and played most genre yesterday, from rock, to classical to j-pop,
all songs played by the omega2 flawlessly,
I also have the chance to audition the SR-009 (yeah), side by side with the SR-007Mk2,
driven from the SRM-007tII,
even though the technicalities on the SR-009 is slightly better, slightly here means the difference is really small, (a bit better soundstage and extension),
I prefer the darker sounding SR-007Mk2, as its very relaxing to hear, the brighter and less bodied SR-009 is not as relaxed as the 007Mk2
Anonymous
Awesome review there man. 😉
You know after the LCD-2 is released I think it would take a lot of people away from the O2. Tonally very similar (the version 1 at least), and though it’s not quite electrostatic-smooth like the O2, the bass is just phenomenal, and it doesn’t require a $2000 amplifier to drive. And at the end, bass remains the #1 problem I see with Stax headphones. Especially more that our music these days tend to be beats-heavy.
Ahok
yeah, LCD-2Mk1 is very similar tonally wise to the O2Mk2,
the LCD-2 is a steal for its price, for its phenomenal bass, simplicity of its setup, and the level of sound it produces,
i think the LCD2 is more suited to nowadays beaty music than the O2, which has narrower genre bandwith, although i have no problem playing j-pop music on the O2Mk2, 😀
Chevrol1
This review is a joke.
How many times did he wrote “black background”?
What is a black background, is it absence of noise or what? If so, how many headphones noise by them themselves?
” you know that you’re still not using the best amplifier there is for the Omega2.” -about SRM-717.
Ok, says who? Any independent test results that confirm this?
Actually, Omega2 might be the best headphone in the world, I don’t know, but this kind of bullshit and nonsense isn’t useful for anyone.
Mike
Yes I was just joking and this article is a total bullshit.
STARSTERN
the same amp that you suggest for the audeze lcd 2-3 ,is also suggested by you to pair the stax Omega2 sroo9 ?
in other words its BHSE or alo 6 or somthing else ?
Dave Ulrich
Electrostats usually require a special amplifier
Mike
No the Stax headphones need a different type of amp.
STARSTERN
which one you suggest ?
Mike
I like the WA5 + WEE combo
STARSTERN
sound wise they do better then BHSE ?
just bringing that one up again ,since seen many prefer that for their stax
Mike
Yes best set up I’ve heard
STARSTERN
thank you ;
recently have came across ,some reviews saying that lcd-xc by audeze with the wright amp ,they get almost the same quality sound ,as stax 009 with paired BHSE ,i asked them and waiting whether respond will come ,my question ,stax 009 as electrostatic can only be better in transparency and detail ,but sometimes thats a minus ‘since it gives a very analytic touch to the listener ,while audeze lcd x should be the better in the sound signature that you always prefer ,’which is warmness and joy ” am i wright ?
Mike
The Stax sound is unique and it’s a nice sound to listen to. The problem is ultimately Stax just can’t deliver a decent bass even from the BHSE. Planars are taking over as it’s very easy to get the bass out of planars.
And what music these days don’t require bass?
STARSTERN
BHSE with Psvane EL34PH’s tubes !?
Tugbars
Probably while saying “black background” he is refering to the better clarity & separation with 007 due to faster transient response of electrostatic drivers. Hd800’s transducer’s is not as fast as 007, so the sound layers get blended to each other during complex passages. When 007 fed by a better amp like KGSSHV Carbon the soundstage gets wider and the bass & treble extends more. KGSS is a good amp but it’s like 3 times weaker than Carbon. 007s are the hardest to drive STAX, they need a lot of power to work at their full potential.
OffRamp
I think the reason he didn’t understand black background is because he never has equipment where he experienced it. You got to pay for that…
I really need to write a progress report for the guys here as stuff I finally got up and running.
At present trying to decide what electrostatic amp I’m going to buy. It’s a tough choice Woo Audio WES, BHSE, Stax 007t, or so.
Got the 339 did tube roll, main system running, got V850, V281 sold out, lotta stuff sold out.
Probably get a second DAC to run electro’s, Mytek or something?
Always in the background
Always reading around