Okay, the Carat UD-1 is definitely a desktop unit, as it doesn’t have any internal batteries, nor does it have an external power supply connector. Hence the USB bus supplies both digital data and the power to the UD-1. It’s dimensions are quite small for a desktop DAC, somewhere in between the Ibasso D10 and the Audinst HUD-MX1, though it’s fairly large by portable amps standard. It has good build quality, utilizing a Hammond style case, with very good fit and finish quality. On the back panel you find a pair of RCA out, a 3.5mm out, a USB digital input, and a Toslink optical digital output. It may not have the optical and coaxial input of the Ibasso D10, but I think USB is enough, given that most people pair these DACs with the PC, not with a desktop CDP. On the front panel, there is a 1/4″ phone jack connector, power led, volume knob, and a toggle switch for choosing the desired output between headphones or RCA outs. For this review I used a humble pair of DIY Canare 3.5mm to RCA, and RCA to RCA interconnects. I could’ve used a fancy RCA interconnects, but that would put the handycap on the Ibasso, since its line out utilizes a 3.5mm connector, and I don’t have a fancy 3.5mm to RCA cable.
MFC
Great review. Thanks for taking your time to do this.
So do you consider/experience that the Audinst HUD-Mx1, only related to sound quality and ability to power both lower and higher impedance headphones/IEM's, to match up with the Ibasso-D10 or even perform/sound better. Just to help me do the right choice.
Mike
Hi. Yes, I find the sound quality of the Audinst HUD-MX1 to be better the Ibasso D10, either headphone out quality (not considering output power), or as standalone DAC. Keep in mind that the HUD-MX1 is a desktop unit though, as it requires an external power supply, while the Ibasso can be used for a portable system.
David
Mike, what you found with Carat UD-1 and iBasso D10 is confirming that electronic design is not just about putting high quality components together to get something good. WM8740 chip on iBasso is a much superior (at least technically) than the DAC section on PCM2704 on Carat. It is back to how they are implemented, how good the board layout is designed and the choice of components value and quality, play very important on the final sound of a DAC. The PCM2704, being a single chip, have the benefit that the data bits received by the USB receiver would be internally converted into meaningful input for its DAC, sans the I2S conversion whatsoever. The internal picture of UD-1 on http://www.benchclub.com/board/dir_img/vgaclub_re… showing that Styleaudio is seriously design their product. The value choice of bypass capacitors (1uF) seems following the recommended value on PCM2704 datasheet, but they use high quality WIMA caps there. The Carat board seems to be well thought with a large ground plane on the top of the board (basically permitting a star grounding flow) and added with the use of hole mounted components. On the other hand, looking at the picture of iBasso D10 board show that the DAC section must share the space with the usb receiver section, battery charger section and the headphone amplifier section, all squeezed in about the same space as Carat (http://img147.imageshack.us/i/d101.jpg/ and http://img294.imageshack.us/i/ibassod10014.jpg/)….. look at that messy groundplane?. WM8740 benefits of having differential output, turn out into a limitation in such a small space. iBasso D10 design is seems to optimistic…. which lead to unoptimal DAC implementation.
Mike
Hi David,
Thanks for the deep and insightful comment.
MFC
Mike,
Thank you. I am aware of that the HUD-MX1 is a dedicated desktop unit.
To me, $179 certainly looks like a very attractive and reasonable price and I will give it a shot. I look forward to read your forthcoming reviews.
Mike
Hi MFC,
I will be doing more comparison involving the Audinst HUD-MX1 with the Nuforce uDAC and the HeadAmp Pico DAC. Quite different in price, but interesting nonetheless.
theo
great review, im almost sold on the audinst, id love to read a carat topaz. vs audinst hud mx1.
thanks this is much appreciated
Mike
Hi Theo,
Still no news from Styleaudio about the rest of their line up. 🙁
wahyuwahyu
Hi, Mike.
thanks for your poisonous review.. 😀
I want to ask something, mike. Is the output on the back panel RCAs the same as the headphone amp output?
And I just wonder, what if you compare some DACs under $100 such as govibe, uca202, or anything else.
Just my wonder, mike.. 😀
best regards..
Mike
Hi wahyuwahyu,
It seems that the RCA out and the headphone out takes the same output pin from the PCM2704.
The Behringer UCA202 is fairly cheap at ~$50, but it looks more like a device that's designed to provide additional input/output functionality for a recording set up, rather than a dedicated audiophile DAC. Reviews? Perhaps, if I can get a hold of one. 🙂 The Govibe DAC would be more appropriate to compare to though.
theo
yea ive also been super curious to see how the go vibe magnum's compare too,, i think there is two different model thou
cheers
Mike
The Govibes huh? Let me talk to Jaben about that.
johnny
korea and china are producing a lot more audio gears lately, and the more important thing seem to be the fact that they produce those gears at relatively cheaper prices with matching or even higher quality. I am looking forward for more of such reviews
Mike
Even some high end audio brands, such as the Japanese CEC brand is actually made in China, according to their specs and designs. So, it's clear that the chinese have the capability of high quality production. The problem with the chinese brands is that they're still novices when it comes to product design, user interfaces, and such. It's only a matter of time before they'll mature though.
The korean, on the other hand, I find to be better than the chinese product in the sense that their build quality and overall product design is superior. Cowon, iriver, and styleaudio being very good examples.
FLACvest
Well Folks, I don't know about you, but I've been living with my iRiver H120 & H140 and iBasso D10 for years.
I just upgraded to HiFlight's v.3 Topkit for the iBasso D10 consisting of an adaptor for the LR amp socket, a custom, Class A Biased TLE2141 opamps in a dual mono module if i guess at the config right from the way it looks, and the nice EL8201 opamp buffers.
voicing, dnamism, and realism are enhanced with this… not that the D10 with its excellent Standard Topkit or choices for opamp rolling was a slouch for starters.
I used to prefer the elastic bass-to-stretchy-treble signature of the LMH6643 in the LR, with the AD8656 as BUFFERS, but now I'm in nirvana, as everything is sounding studio accurate and organic, and I primarily listen to Electronic Music.
HOWEVER,
I WOULD like to comment that competition is good, and I'm interested in Styleaudio's product line becoming more easily available.
Mike
Hi FLACvest,
I'm not familiar with the D10's internals, but from what you're saying, the mods really seem to take the D10 to a whole new level. Would love to hear it one day. 🙂
harsya
hey mike have you ever tried the dac section of corda 3move? how is it compared to ud1?
Anonymous
It’s hard to do a real A-B comparison cause you can’t isolate the DAC section of the Corda 3 separate from the amp. But the UD-1’s DAC is actually very good when compared to the built in DACs on most portable amps. It’s definitely superior to the Ibasso D10 and even D4 with dual Wolfsons.
harsya
this ud1 is really tempting lol. about the corda3, actually ive never tried the dac section of this particular amp from meier audio, can you give a short impression about the 3move in term of the overall sq of its dac section?
and where can i get carat ud1 here in Indonesia?
Anonymous
It’s not going to be easy. Your best bet is contact Styleaudio directly.
http://styleaudio.typepad.com/styleaudio_hifi_usb_mini_/international-dealers.html
DodgersKings323
This is where it gets confusing, would it better to go with say the Headstage Arrow + UD-1 or just the MX1 to do both jobs?
Anonymous
I would just go with the Audinst and keep the Arrow for portable duties.
CCE
How does it compared to E10? According to your description,the amp seems certainly inferior. But how about the DAC? Their price is pretty close..
Anonymous
I am pretty sure that the DAC section is better than the E10.
CCE
Just emailed the local distributor, too bad it’s discontinued.
It’s replaced by the HD-1V with almost 3x the price.
Anonymous
Aww that’s too bad because the UD-1 was a very nice entry level DAC unit.