Focal Clear MG and Celestee review

Celestee – sound quality 

The recently-retired Elegia garnered a reputation as a properly-sorted closed-back audiophile headphone with a mid-forward, mildly neutral tuning with great imaging and dynamics. It’s perennial criticism was that it is a fraction bass-light, and that it suffers from a slightly congested staging. While on paper the Celestee has a similar-sounding driver arrangement in terms of its 40mm diameter and its aluminium/magnesium construction, out of the box it’s most definitely a differently-tuned headphone, despite (disclaimer) me not having heard the Elegia for a few months now. At a first listen, the Celestee reveals itself to have a lively, dynamic tuning matched with great detail retrieval and is pleasingly well-extended at either end of the frequency response graph. Tonally, the Celestee is more on the leaner side of the equation but has a nice tickling of warmth as opposed to being out-and-out ‘lush’.

Dealing with the bass question right off the bat, The Roots’ ‘Mellow my Man’ thumps with a pleasing amount of dynamic kick. The Celestee’s bass extends nice and low into the sub-bass district and has a slight mid-bass rise that adds a degree of warmth to the Celestee’s voicing without interfering with mid-range whatsoever. While the Elegia always felt a little lean to me when it came to playing with certain genres like EDM and hip-hop, the Celestee is able to wrangle both without breaking a sweat thanks to its extra bass energy that never feels bloated nor sluggish. 

The Celestee has a slightly less ‘in your face’ mid-range compared to my memories of the Elegia, managing to create some great ‘rock-out’ energy and excitement in the electric guitar tracks in Tinariwen’s ‘Sasstanaqqam’, whilst creating an entirely believable male vocal performance in terms of texture and tone. Female vocals are equally-well performed by the Celestee – Snail Mail’s ‘Pristine’ is crystalline in quality, with rather natural decay. 

The Celestee hits the ‘Goldilocks’-zone in the treble department in terms of balancing great detail and insight, whilst never venturing into harshness nor sibilance territory. It’s able to resolve the nuances of Pearl Jam’s live performance of ‘Even Flow’, but I would have liked it to dig a little deeper into the mix when it comes to the realism and texture of acoustic guitar and cymbal parts. 

Focal’s ‘Home’ line-up of headphones have never been soundstage monsters, and the Celestee isn’t an outlier in this regard. It’s not able to overcome physics in terms of overcoming the physical confines of a closed-back design, and as such it presents a distinctly ‘in-head’ experience that is somewhat congested – even by closed-back standards. It’s able to give a sense of where the different orchestral parts are coming from in Howard Shore’s ‘The Three Hunters’ from The Two Towers soundtrack, but the Celestee never gives you a sense of vastness. The Celestee is certainly dynamic in terms of its sense of ‘drama’ and punch, but its narrowly sandwiched soundstage tends to somewhat dampen the party. 

Vs Focal Radiance

Many of you might be asking if the Celestee is simply a Focal Radiance minus the Bentley badging, automotive leather, and black aesthetics. Can you pick up the Radiance’s performance in a navy-blue tone for $300 less? Well, no. They’re very much different-sounding headphones, and this is evident in their respective bass response. The Radiance is clearly a warmer and more bass-rich sounding headphone, with Guns N’ Roses ‘Better’ revealing the Radiance to have a good few dB of bass shelf below 150Hz compared to the more even-sounding Celestee. 

The Radiance also has a whisker more treble energy, making for a slightly more ‘exciting’ and shamelessly ‘fun’ overall sound, whereas the Celestee has a more ‘audiophile, by no means unengaging sound. If they were the same price, I’d pick Radiance every day of the week. Whether you think they’re worth the additional three Benjamins will come down to your sonic preference, and if you like the idea of getting your hands on a slightly more rare offering (and if you can live with the slightly more ostentatious Bentley badging). 

Vs Dan Clark Audio Aeon 2 Noir 

The $899 Aeon 2 Noire is likely to be the Celestee’s primary foe in the fight for wallets and ears in the sub-$1K closed-back headphone, and they certainly make for an interesting, and a rather close tussle. They go about making ‘noise’ in completely different ways, with Dan Clark Audio opting for the speed and technicalities of planar magnetic drivers, while Focal has never strayed from the tonal benefits and speaker-like properties that dynamic drivers offer. On the head, the Aeon 2 Noire is far and away a more comfortable pair of headphones, offering nearly zero perceived weight on the top of your head, and it also perches there a fraction more securely, dispersing its weight a little more evenly. Sonically, the Celestee trumps the Aeon 2 Noire for warmth, slam and dynamics. ‘Epic’ by Faith No More sounds a little more, um, ‘epic’. It’s certainly a more engaging listen in terms of visceral impact, but more extended listening starts to show some of the brilliance of the Aeon 2 Noire in the technical department. The Aeon’s bass is punchier and quicker, and it offers the treble insight, air and energy that I would dearly love to extract out of the Celestee. 

So which one is the ‘better’ headphone? It’s a tough question, and it’ll come down to what you value from music listening. If you prefer a more linear top-to-bottom tuning with great speed and technical abilities, you’ll probably lean towards the Aeon. If you’re looking for a more ‘fun’, dynamic experience with a bit more warmth and punch, the Celestee is likely going to be your candidate.

Amping and power requirements

Focal is rather refreshing in the high-end headphone realm in that they have never produced cans that need to be strapped to the back of a speaker amp to extract proper performance out of them. Rather, their high-end headphones are quite sensitive and are able to be paired with modestly powered sources to great effect. Naturally, your experience will scale depending on the quality of your source, and the quality of the recording that you’re listening to. 

At 55 ohms impedance and 104dB sensitivity, the Clear MG is a rather easy headphone to drive, and the Celestee at 35-ohms impedance and 105dB sensitivity is even more so. I tested both with a range of solid-state amplifiers, including the new Playmate 2 from Burson (key an eye out for the review coming soon to Headfonia), which easily powered both Focals happily in low-gain mode. The Clear MG and Celestee yielded expectedly excellent performance from the extremely neutral and powerful Topping A90 which did lean a little on the drier and analytical side, but my favourite source for each is the class-A ‘Current Mode’ CMA600i from Questyle which added a hint of warmth and richness. 

For science, I tried pairing the Clear MG with my Bottlehead Crack which has an output impedance just South of 100 ohms with its Tung Sol 5998 power tube, which made dramatic impacts on bass quantity. While it did make for a much more pronounced low end on the Clear MG, it wasn’t necessarily for the best, being rather tubby and slow. My transformer-coupled tube amp – the Hagerman Tuba – isn’t in the house at the moment, but I’ll be sure to add some notes later down the track once I’ve had the chance to pair the Clear MG and Celestee with it. 

Being sensitive headphones there isn’t much audible benefit in ‘going balanced’ with either the Clear MG or Celestee. The only discernible difference I could hear in either headphone is loudness from the extra voltage that the balanced circuits in the A90 and CMA600i put out. The XLR cable supplied with the Clear MG is provided mainly for convenience and compatibility with a range of sources, but I found that I used it solely due to its extra length and usability.

Both headphones are a great pairing with high-quality portable sources, and I did spend a good period of time using the Celestee in a solely portable set-up.  I thoroughly enjoyed partnering the Celestee with the excellent SE200 digital audio player from Astell&Kern which managed to perform extremely well in single-ended mode via the Celestee’s 1.2m 3.5mm cable, eking-out excellent dynamics and instrument separation. 

Final thoughts

Focal ought to have two more ‘hits’ on their hands on their hands in the Celestee and Clear MG. The Celestee bests the outgoing Elegia in just about every regard, and enjoys some much-appreciated trickle-down sonic and visual cues from the Stellia and Radiance, all wrapped up in a far more subdued, palatable packaging. It makes a strong contender as one of the go-to recommendations for the best closed-back headphones under a grand, sneaking-in by a mere ten bucks. 

While I might have some personal reservations about the sonic direction that Focal has taken the Clear MG in as a huge fan of the voicing of the original model, they have gone and made one of the most instantly easy-to-love high-end open-backed headphones with their all-new model. Tonally, the Clear MG serves up lashings of detail with a hugely balanced signature while adding a degree of richness, texture and dynamics that will no doubt convert listeners away from more analytic offerings like the Sennheiser HD800s. Oh, and I reckon it looks sensational, to boot.

4.4/5 - (53 votes)

Hailing from Sydney's eastern beaches, Matty runs his own beer business, 'Bowlo Draught', as well as working in creative advertising. When he's not enjoying his hifi and vinyl collection at home, he can probably be found rolling-up on the green at his beloved Bondi Bowling Club.


  • Reply March 18, 2021


    Hopefully, next, we’ll get a replacement for the sub-kilobuck open back Elear. I bet it will have the same gorgeous colorway as the Celestee.

    • Reply March 19, 2021


      There is a bit of a gap in their range right about there at the moment – let’s watch this space!

  • Reply March 19, 2021


    “ The Celestee’s drivers use the same materials and dimensions as the Elegia, yet have been retuned for a completely-new sound signature. ”

    Is the Celestee driver any different to the Elegia, or is the tuning in the new hybrid pads?

  • Reply March 19, 2021

    Mike I

    Hi Matty,
    Very nice review, as always.
    Do you know if Focal will provide the dedicated profiles for these headphones on their Arche amp ?
    Nice regards,

    • Reply March 19, 2021


      I don’t know for certain, but I’d be very surprised if a firmware update wasn’t inbound shortly!

  • Reply March 21, 2021

    Rick K

    I’ve read a few reviews that say the Celestee has the solid copper voice coil as opposed to the copper clad aluminum ones used in the Elear (I have a pair) and the Elegia. Some other reviews say it uses the same internals as the Elegia just retuned. I would guess it’s the former with the significant sound difference. Anyone know if the truth is out there?

  • Reply March 21, 2021

    Farb Sklarb

    That should be “Vive l’évolution.” Grammar matters, even in French.

    • Reply March 21, 2021


      I agree wholeheartedly – this Aussie only has his learner’s permit in French…

  • Reply March 22, 2021


    Thanks so much Matty, I ordered the Radiance! Love the bling factor (big automobile enthusiast as well) and a “fun” sound is definitely what I’m hoping for!

    • Reply March 22, 2021

      Matty Graham

      I think you’re going to be in for a Good Time mate. Enjoy!

  • Reply March 22, 2021

    Tibor Michalčík

    Hello. Thank you again. If I am not mistaken, did you review Audio Technica ATH AWAS too? Could you compare the two? They are the same price in Europe and I cannot justify the price of Clears somehow…
    I already bought The Hemp thanks to your review, so I will appreciate little help again! 😀
    Have a nice day 🙂

    • Reply March 23, 2021

      Matty Graham

      Hi Tibor, I don’t have the AWAS with me at the moment so I can’t give you a direct comparison. I can tell you that the Celestee will give you a far more ‘classic’ closed-back experience with more punch, slam and isolation. The AWAS is lighter, more comfortable, more spacious, and a bit more articulate particularly in the mid-range and lower treble. Looks-wise, they’re apples and oranges – that might be the deciding factor for you.

  • Reply March 23, 2021

    Karel Kostlivý

    A while back, I was picking out a higher-class headphones, and eventually my selection ended up right at Focal Clear.
    I am quite satisfied with them, and their balanced tonality captivates me over and over. It is true that they need a very good partner for the best reproduction. The better the amplifier the better the result…
    I was very interested in the comparison with the new model. And I completely agree with your assessment. I, too, would have preferred the previous model. Although the new model is more… “likable”.
    Thank you for a nice review…

  • Reply June 1, 2021


    Hi Matty,
    Two years ago I followed Lieven‘s recommendation and got the Focal Elear. I’m quite happy about it. 🙂 Now I’m thinking about whether an upgrade to the new Clear MG is worth it given the that the Clears are not exactly cheap. What do you think?


  • Reply November 3, 2023


    Maybe it’s a strange question, but does anybody compared them with Beyerdynamic DT 1990 PRO ?
    Choosing between them. Listened to both. Focals seems like more detailed and precise, more “nuances”. But when I firstly listening to 1990 Beyers, on another DAC and without direct comparsion with Focals, they sonded quite impressive… Which one do you think is better for overal listening? Rock & Drumm&Base

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.