Sendy Audio Peacock Review

Sound Quality

The Peacock is a fun and warm-sounding headphone with good dynamics and technicalities. It has good resolution and control across all ranges, maybe except the treble region. Its planar magnetic driver design has many strengths, but some parts of its sound can be improved. Let me share my thoughts about that below.

Listening setup: Earmen Tradutto DAC – Flux Labs FA-22 Amplifier

Bass

The bass response of the Peacock is impactful and quick at the same time. You don’t often find these two terms together but the Peacock manages to do that. The bass is certainly very capable with excellent texture, speed, and rumble. This is one of those headphones that I think the quantity and quality are nicely balanced optimally.

The bass presentation is simply the best part about the Peacock since it has great PRaT, decay, and extension. The bass doesn’t dominate the sound, but it still has great presence and definition. However, to have that presentation you need to have a powerful setup. I tried to listen to the Peacock from different setups than I’ve mentioned above, and the result wasn’t good enough. So even though the headphone looks not so hard to drive on paper, be sure to feed the headphone with plenty of power with good amplification.

Sendy Audio Peacock

So overall, the bass performance is excellent and I didn’t find any weakness in this region of the spectrum. There’s good bass balance, good control, good resolution, and good texture. An ideal bass presentation to say the least. If you’re after an analytical and flat sound though, you can look at different options since this is a warm bass with impact and kick with good quantity.

Mids

Again, the mids are quite warm just like the bass, and the tonality is the biggest advantage of the Peacock. Mids are very natural sounding with a fluid and smooth nature. There’s a good definition here, especially with vocals, and the positioning is quite nice. There’s also a great timbre which is very realistic and lively. The instruments are a real joy since they sound very natural and organic with an analogue-like approach. The tonal accuracy and quality of the Peacock are excellent indeed.

So I liked the mid-range performance regarding these factors above, but from a technical standpoint, some areas can be improved. I think mids lack resolution, and it needs more clarity and openness in this area. Mids sound a bit veiled at times, and you wonder what would happen if there’s more transparency here. Sure, the Peacock has excellent tonality and definition in mids, but it would’ve been great if it had a more resolving mid-range presentation.

Sendy Audio Peacock

Treble

The treble presentation is something I would call “fun” since it reproduces the treble in a splashy and crispy way. Highs have a very good definition and they sound articulated. If you like your treble slightly aggressive and crisp, the Peacock would give you that. However, the performance here could be a bit polarizing. Even so, the treble has great resolution.

On the other hand, it is not fully extended. While that’s fine since not every headphone manages to do that perfectly, the Peacock reproduces the treble in a metallic way. The timbre in the mid-range is excellent as I’ve mentioned, but it’s not that successful when it comes to treble. The fun signature may suit many people nicely depending on the genres they prefer to listen to.

When I look at this from a purist audiophile perspective though, there needs to be more extension and the treble should be more relaxed and refined. The “metallic” tone of the treble makes some songs exciting at times but doesn’t work well with others.

Page 1: Info, Package, Design, Build, Comfort
Page 3: Technical Performance, Comparisons, Conclusion
4/5 - (26 votes)
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedin

A keen audiophile and hobby photographer, Berkhan is after absolute perfection. Whether it is a full-frame camera or a custom in-ear, his standpoint persists. He tries to keep his photography enthusiasm at the same level as audio. Sometimes photography wins, sometimes his love for music takes over and he puts that camera aside. Simplistic expressions of sound in his reviews are the way to go for him. He enjoys a fine single malt along with his favourite Jazz recordings.

7 Comments

  • Reply November 7, 2021

    MadMex

    Would it kill you to post a photo of these bad boys on your head? For scale? Come on man. Nonetheless, nice write up.

  • Reply November 8, 2021

    Hanesbeef

    Can I ask why you give it 5 out of 5 stars, if it needs improvement?

    • Reply November 8, 2021

      Hanesbeef

      Sorry! Just realized the 5 stars are a reader’s rating! My mistake!

  • Reply March 29, 2022

    Steve Jones

    When you grade the sound you say it has, and I quote “since it has great PRaT, decay, and extension”. Yet in the conclusions you say it needs, Quote ” better transparency and PRaT”. You have totally contradicted yourself. You also said they sounded a bit metallic. Could it have been the solid state amplifier with which I am not familiar? I have listened to them on my Schiit Ragnarok and my tubed Mk VIII SE and found them to be excellent with not a hint of metallic sound. In fact using High Resolution .flac files and a good DAC, Pink Floyd, Diane Schuur, Rickie Lee Jones and Roger Waters have never sounded better and I am coming from Senheisser HD-650’s and Denon AH-5000’s. What’s up with that? Maybe you just needed a better source and more power?

    • Reply April 1, 2022

      Berkhan

      I loved the bass response but the rest doesn’t have great quickness and energy.

      It’s OK you find your headphone very good. Enjoy it and put it to good use. We’re not supposed to think the same.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.