Technical Performance
It’s not the most revealing monitoring and soundstage wise it isn’t the widest and most extended sounding. On stage and in the studio it’s not something that it needs to do either. The amount of space and air is on the lower side and you get a more intimate, inside-your-head presentation. The UE 5 Pro is to feel the music, and that’s why it was tuned in this way.
So being a monitoring device, the sound-stage isn’t the most desirable. The depth is reasonably good, and it makes up for it with good instrument separation, dark background and very good PRaT. I’m very impressed by the pace of this monitor. It’s just quick, well-defined, and accurately presents the music in terms of tonality and sharpness. Even when you’re not performing, this is a monitor that will deliver your favourite tunes musically and enjoyably.
The key characteristics of the UE 5 Pro for me are the following: Tightness, impact, clarity and pace. The UE 5 Pro is a particular monitor, but I feel it’s important to point out that it is enjoyable. I have been using it a lot right before going to bed, or while I’m at work. It lets you concentrate on the music. It’s fluid, tight, maybe a bit in your face, or a bit too focused, but it naturally does everything. Even though it’s not the most refined, it’s engaging, musical to listen to, and addictive.
Comparisons
The Swiss SH-2 CIEM has a similar 2BA set-up inside. Its fit is tighter with longer nozzles, and the overall build quality is better. The UE 5 Pro is more comfortable though, whilst the SH-2 isolates better.
The sound in the SH-2 has a stronger bass response with more rumble and kick. The UE 5 Pro stays moderate in that part. The SH-2 also has more sub-bass, which the UE 5 Pro lacks. The midrange in the SH-2 is quite warm, whilst the UE 5 is more neutral, with slight musicality.
The treble on both is on the softer side, but the SH-2 is more controlled, whilst the UE 5 is a bit more aggressive in the lower treble. They’re both good monitors for stage and studio purposes, so it’s a matter of taste. SH-2 for stronger bass, full-bodied sound with warmth. UE 5 Pro for neutrality with a hint of musicality and focus.
Elsa is one of the best CIEMs for the money since it’s difficult to find a proper CIEM under the 1000$ range, let alone around 700$. The Elsa is built well, with a very comfortable fit just like the UE.
Sound-wise Shozy has more clarity, resolution and transparency. They both have a similar bass response with great control and pace, but I think Shozy’s offering does a better job overall. The mid-range performs very well on both monitors, however, the Elsa makes the difference with more transparency and detail. Its treble is more pronounced and extended too, and with better control without too many peaks. The UE tends to peak here and there, depending on the circumstances (source/recording).
Conclusion
The Ultimate Ears UE 5 Pro perfectly shows the company’s abilities to create a good custom IEM. I have enjoyed the overall presentation of the Ultimate Ears UE 5 PRO. It for sure isn’t the best technical achiever on the market but it never pretends to be either.
With just two drivers, the sound is exceptionally coherent and balanced. It has that neutral quality with a hint of musicality and spot-on timbre. If you’re a studio guy or just an audiophile who enjoys the neutral monitoring sound, the UE 5 Pro is a great choice with a competitive price.
Not to mention the Switch system allows you to personalize your monitors in more ways possible than ever before.
Page 1: Ultimate Ears, Switch, UE 5 PRO, Specs
Page 2: Personalization, Cable, Price & Accessories, Sound
Page 3: Sound Pt2, Comparisons, Conclusion
