Earsonics Blade Review

Today we have a review of the new Hybrid IEM from Earsonics, the Earsonics Blade which costs €549.

Disclaimer: The Earsonics Blade was provided by Earsonics directly. The review reflects my unbiased opinions as always. Sound impressions were taken with Dethonray DTR1 and Astell & Kern SP2000 DAPs. Some parts of this review are identical to the Earsonics Stark review since they share the same materials and the same design. 

Hybrid Design from France

Earsonics decided to make their first two hybrid IEMs and they recently launched the Stark and Blade. Considering Earsonics’ track record and their house sound, I’m surprised that it took this much time for them to unveil a hybrid IEM. Earsonics has always been a company that prioritized fun and enjoyable sound rather than reference. That’s why they have a distinctive fan base after all.

So when these models came out, I wasn’t surprised. However, I was quite curious about the sound they would offer us. After some time with the Blade, I’m in a position to fully review it and see how it performs.

About Earsonics

The French IEM manufacturer is a well-recognized brand with a good reputation among audiophiles. It was established in 2005 by Franck Lopez and the priority back in the day was to provide good monitoring solutions for the artists on stage.

Then it evolved to be a very popular IEM manufacturer for audiophiles, especially for those who seek out something “different”. We have reviewed lots of Earsonics gear over the years. The S-EM9, ES2 & 3, EM10, S-EM6 v2, ES5, Grace, and the list goes on and on including the older ones like the S-EM6, EM32, and the EM6 (Custom Version). Our last Earsonics review was the EM64 stage monitor by Lieven. My last one, however, was the Purple model, which is still in our Best Universal IEMs list.

About Blade

As I mentioned, Earsonics has released 2 hybrid IEMs called Stark and Blade. The Blade is the lower-priced version with 3 drivers (1+2). The Stark’s little brother has an 8 mm. dynamic driver which is the same with the Stark in terms of diameter. Earsonics combined that driver together with 2 BA drivers for the rest of the spectrum.

Aside from the internal design, the external has been drastically changed. The acrylic or plastic shells are gone. Now we have anodized zinc and magnesium alloy for the shells. Also, the internal electronics are secured in a 3D acrylic housing inside for perfect positioning and also for acoustic reasons.

Build Quality & Design

So yes, the new Blade boasts quality. I mean, it’s incredible. I’m one of those people who criticized Earsonics’ plastic shells, which honestly didn’t live up to their price brackets in the past. With their new hybrid series, Earsonics have managed to pull off a huge jump in terms of build quality.

The Earsonics Blade has a fantastic build quality. There’s no other way to put it. When I opened the box and inspected the earpieces, I said “wow, finally”. This is a great new era for Earsonics in my opinion, and I hope they will keep up the same high level with new models. This is a big leap forward. The users of these new models now can smoothly say that they get what they paid for.

The design topic is always subjective of course, but I can say that the Blade looks even better in real life than in the photos. Compared to the Stark’s silver faceplate part with brown inner shell, the Blade has a brown faceplate and a black inner part. It looks quite serious and professional. The faceplate parts reflect the light nicely with different angles. However, the cable doesn’t complete this design well in my view. The silver color is ill-fitted with these colors especially with silver 3.5mm jack and 2-pin connectors.

So as I said in Stark’s own review, I didn’t really like the new cable. It’s good that they don’t supply the stock Plastics One cable anymore, but I think that the new “Hi-Res” cable doesn’t look premium enough to complement this new design. I think a more premium looking cable would’ve been perfect. A black colored one of course.

Fit

The new chassis structure means extra weight and the Blade is a heavy monitor when compared to many IEMs. So not every tip is good for the best fitting experience, at least that has been the case for me. Fortunately, Earsonics provide lots of ear tips in the package. Gone are the days when Earsonics would ship only a few tips, you have many choices now. Standard silicone ones, black double flanges, and foams. So you have lots here. I’m sure one would find the best possible fit for their needs.

In my case the classic Earsonics double flange tips work the best. They provide me a snug fit and they balance out the weight nicely. They also go very deep into my ear canals. That way the isolation also becomes satisfying, although not being on the same level as foams. The shells stick out pretty much especially with double flange ones since the chassis is not too compact or small. There is certain heft and mass so don’t expect to have a quick nap with these.

The review continues on PAGE 2 with sound performance.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

A keen audiophile and hobby photographer, Berkhan is after absolute perfection. Whether it is a full frame camera or a custom in-ear, his standpoint persists the same. He tries to keep his photography enthusiasm at the same level with audio. Sometimes photography wins, sometimes his love for music takes him over and he puts that camera aside. Simplistic expressions of sound in his reviews is the way to go for him. He enjoys a fine single malt along with his favourite Jazz recordings.

2 Comments

  • Reply August 27, 2020

    kavita

    Great Article. I will come again and again ito read your amazing post.
    Thanks
    Gaadgetheart

  • Reply September 25, 2020

    rantng

    You mentioned the Meze Rai Penta briefly. Could you provide comparisons with the Blade or Stark?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.